Prev: Configuring XML Serialization to not add an element
Next: Foreign keys using LINQ to SQL
From: Mark Rae [MVP] on 31 Mar 2010 12:30
"r norman" <r_s_norman(a)comcast.net> wrote in message
news:4ho6r5psjfl9ojorkrd92cktcrtash2alf(a)4ax.com...

> Can this be done?

Yes.


> Can it be done "easily"?

Yes, if you have lots of experience with ASP.NET / AJAX / JavaScript /
jQuery etc...


--
Mark Rae
ASP.NET MVP
http://www.markrae.net

From: r norman on 31 Mar 2010 13:04
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 17:30:07 +0100, "Mark Rae [MVP]"
<mark(a)markrae.net> wrote:

>"r norman" <r_s_norman(a)comcast.net> wrote in message
>news:4ho6r5psjfl9ojorkrd92cktcrtash2alf(a)4ax.com...
>
>> Can this be done?
>
>Yes.
>
>
>> Can it be done "easily"?
>
>Yes, if you have lots of experience with ASP.NET / AJAX / JavaScript /
>jQuery etc...

Thanks, I'll put those on the list of things to learn. When the time
comes to do it, I'll put in the time necessary to gain "lots of
experience".

My impression from your answer is that simple ASP.NET won't do it. I
would need client side scripts querying the server for new data and
then updating controls on the page without a total refresh.
From: Mark Rae [MVP] on 31 Mar 2010 13:24
"r norman" <r_s_norman(a)comcast.net> wrote in message
news:1tv6r5pfitv3fr6cval00oellb5to1tt94(a)4ax.com...

> My impression from your answer is that simple ASP.NET won't do it.

Correct.


> I would need client side scripts querying the server for new data and
> then updating controls on the page without a total refresh.

Several ways. I'd (almost) certainly use the JavaScript setTimeout() method
to make an AJAX call to a server-side method at regular intervals...


--
Mark Rae
ASP.NET MVP
http://www.markrae.net

From: r norman on 31 Mar 2010 14:34
On Wed, 31 Mar 2010 18:24:58 +0100, "Mark Rae [MVP]"
<mark(a)markrae.net> wrote:

>"r norman" <r_s_norman(a)comcast.net> wrote in message
>news:1tv6r5pfitv3fr6cval00oellb5to1tt94(a)4ax.com...
>
>> My impression from your answer is that simple ASP.NET won't do it.
>
>Correct.
>
>
>> I would need client side scripts querying the server for new data and
>> then updating controls on the page without a total refresh.
>
>Several ways. I'd (almost) certainly use the JavaScript setTimeout() method
>to make an AJAX call to a server-side method at regular intervals...

Thanks again. You have pointed me in a good direction. That gives me
some indication of how much time it will take to learn to develop a
proper application. In the meantime, my C# .NET client using WCF
works well so the users will just have to wait (and pay) for the
change appropriately.

From: Family Tree Mike on 31 Mar 2010 17:14
On 3/31/2010 12:27 PM, Mark Rae [MVP] wrote:
> "dphizler" <dphizler(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:f388f875-6131-49a0-9992-4597ff37c796(a)k17g2000vbm.googlegroups.com...
>
>> The whole converting C++ to C# being painless is very interesting to
>> me.
>
> C# is part of the C family of computing languages. There are many
> similarities, especially in terms of syntax. There are, of course, many
> differences too..
>
>
>> As a result, this C# will be easy to use in an ASP.NET web app?
>
> Again, it's impossible to answer that question...
>
>

It may also be possible to keep the C++ as C++. Just build a managed
c++ dll that can be called by the web app.

--
Mike
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: Configuring XML Serialization to not add an element
Next: Foreign keys using LINQ to SQL