From: ~BD~ on 16 Mar 2010 11:49 ~BD~ wrote: > Meg wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have NIS 2010, Win XP. Hello again Meg :) I wonder if you will ever get back here again. I know it's not easy when posting from Microsoft Discussions groups! You will have noticed that Peter Foldes has already made a mistake in thinking you are using NAV 2010 when you have, quite clearly, advised that you are using NIS 2010. Is there a difference? Of course! He should know that, viz:- Quote:- "As with previous versions, Symantec's suite offers protection against viruses, Trojans, rootkits, spyware and malware of all kinds. Also, like previous versions, it has a firewall, intrusion protection, e-mail protection and Web protection. It integrates with your browser and search engine to warn you away from visiting sites that might be malicious." That was from the article here:- http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9137758/Review_Norton_Internet_Security_2010_checks_your_reputation_ ** Now, on to his advice: "Uninstall NAV2010 ....." That is not easy to do when you have it integrated within your Norton™ Internet Security 2010 protection programme! I suggest that you retain NIS, for which you have paid good money, and consider advice from others before following the (bad?) advice from Mr Foldes. I have added another group so that you may have access to a wider range of expertise. I am *not* a computer guru, just a user like you! Good luck with solving your problem! -- Dave
From: Tom Willett on 16 Mar 2010 12:04 Raving lunatic. "~BD~" <BoaterDave.is.(a)hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message news:8JmdnaBikro_NQLWnZ2dnUVZ8ludnZ2d(a)bt.com... : ~BD~ wrote: : > Meg wrote: : >> Hi, : >> : >> I have NIS 2010, Win XP. : : Hello again Meg :) : : I wonder if you will ever get back here again. I know it's not easy when : posting from Microsoft Discussions groups! : : You will have noticed that Peter Foldes has already made a mistake in : thinking you are using NAV 2010 when you have, quite clearly, advised : that you are using NIS 2010. : : Is there a difference? Of course! He should know that, viz:- : : Quote:- : : "As with previous versions, Symantec's suite offers protection against : viruses, Trojans, rootkits, spyware and malware of all kinds. Also, like : previous versions, it has a firewall, intrusion protection, e-mail : protection and Web protection. It integrates with your browser and : search engine to warn you away from visiting sites that might be malicious." : : That was from the article here:- : : http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9137758/Review_Norton_Internet_Security_2010_checks_your_reputation_ : : ** : : Now, on to his advice: : : "Uninstall NAV2010 ....." : : That is not easy to do when you have it integrated within your NortonT : Internet Security 2010 protection programme! : : I suggest that you retain NIS, for which you have paid good money, and : consider advice from others before following the (bad?) advice from Mr : Foldes. : : I have added another group so that you may have access to a wider range : of expertise. I am *not* a computer guru, just a user like you! Good : luck with solving your problem! : : -- : Dave
From: ~BD~ on 16 Mar 2010 16:23 ~BD~ wrote: > Peter Foldes wrote: >> Meg >> >> Are you using NAV 2010 to scan for virus's and malware? > > > What else would she be using NAV 20010 for? > > Please explain your reasoning. > I'll ask again. Why ever else would Meg be running a scan? -- Dave
From: ~BD~ on 19 Mar 2010 08:02 Peter Foldes wrote: > You crossposting idiot what was the reason you crossposted it to another > group needlessly. Maybe you have misplaced your spectacles, so I'll repeat what I said before:- "I have added another group so that you may have access to a wider range of expertise. I am *not* a computer guru, just a user like you!" Other folk may consider that your recommendation to remove a paid-for product, which is successfully used by tens of thousands of people around the world, a somewhat foolish course of action. You have referred to '...winston' as your friend - yet you seem not to have dissuaded *him* from using NIS. He's now an MVP. Surely an MVP wouldn't use a sub-standard product, would they? I think you may have another, secret, agenda, Mr Foldes. -- Dave
From: ~BD~ on 19 Mar 2010 10:43 Tom Willett wrote: > Raving lunatic. Which information on the site do you dispute? http://www.symantec.com/norton/products/charts/competitive.jsp No one likes a sluggish computer. So we designed the Norton products to be fast and light so they will not slow you down or get on your way. 60% Better Overall Performance How do you measure performance? Passmark Software found 16 different ways. Combine the results and Norton Internet Security performed better than any other security suite tested.* Fastest Scan Speeds Norton 360 version 4.0 scanned 37% faster, Norton Internet Security 2010 scanned 30% faster and Norton Antivirus 2010 scanned 26% faster than their closest competitors.* 68% Less Memory Norton 360 version 4 uses less memory than any of its competitors � and a whopping 68% less memory that the competitive average for total protection solutions.* 14 Times More Frequent Updates Norton streams the most frequent updates to your desktop � providing protection from the latest threats about 270 times a day or nearly 14 times more often that its closest competitor.**** Get a 41% Boost In Boot Time Norton 360 version 4 startup manager optimization boosts boot time by up to 41%.* -- Dave - sounds impressive to me! (I'm using MSE now)
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 Prev: Very Slow XP Shutdown Next: HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT different depending on who is logged in |