From: slider on

The world's governments will not meet their internationally-agreed target of
curbing the loss of species and nature by 2010, a major study has confirmed.

Virtually all species and ecosystems show continued decline, while pressures on
nature are increasing, it concludes.

Published in the journal Science, the study confirms what conservationists have
known for years.

The 2010 target was adopted in 2002, but the scientists behind this study say
implementation has been "woeful".

(BBC Ceefax)

### - so do ya think "virtually all species" includes us too?

(oh well, plus so much then for... Helsinki :)




--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news(a)netfront.net ---
From: Don Stockbauer on
On May 1, 3:10 am, "slider" <sli...(a)anashram.com> wrote:
> The world's governments will not meet their internationally-agreed target of
> curbing the loss of species and nature by 2010, a major study has confirmed.
>
> Virtually all species and ecosystems show continued decline, while pressures on
> nature are increasing, it concludes.
>
> Published in the journal Science, the study confirms what conservationists have
> known for years.
>
> The 2010 target was adopted in 2002, but the scientists behind this study say
> implementation has been "woeful".
>
> (BBC Ceefax)
>
> ### - so do ya think "virtually all species" includes us too?
>
> (oh well, plus so much then for... Helsinki  :)
>
> --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: n...(a)netfront.net ---

A man could have a purdy good time in Vegas with all them things.
From: "Bassos" Root on

"slider" <slider(a)anashram.com> wrote in message
news:hrgnn6$1ihu$1(a)adenine.netfront.net...
>
> The world's governments will not meet their internationally-agreed target
> of
> curbing the loss of species and nature by 2010, a major study has
> confirmed.
>
> Virtually all species and ecosystems show continued decline, while
> pressures on
> nature are increasing, it concludes.

So nature is evolving into something more refined.

Rejoice ?



From: Don Stockbauer on
On May 12, 6:18 am, "Bassos" <Root(a)wan (ask me)> wrote:
> "slider" <sli...(a)anashram.com> wrote in message
>
> news:hrgnn6$1ihu$1(a)adenine.netfront.net...
>
>
>
> > The world's governments will not meet their internationally-agreed target
> > of
> > curbing the loss of species and nature by 2010, a major study has
> > confirmed.
>
> > Virtually all species and ecosystems show continued decline, while
> > pressures on
> > nature are increasing, it concludes.
>
> So nature is evolving into something more refined.
>
> Rejoice ?

Leaner and meaner?
From: "Bassos" Root on

"Don Stockbauer" <donstockbauer(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:0bfa39b5-22cd-4be8-8e66-b4a1aa1cf5c1(a)n15g2000yqf.googlegroups.com...
On May 12, 6:18 am, "Bassos" <Root(a)wan (ask me)> wrote:
> "slider" <sli...(a)anashram.com> wrote in message
>
> news:hrgnn6$1ihu$1(a)adenine.netfront.net...
>
>
>
> > The world's governments will not meet their internationally-agreed
> > target
> > of
> > curbing the loss of species and nature by 2010, a major study has
> > confirmed.
>
> > Virtually all species and ecosystems show continued decline, while
> > pressures on
> > nature are increasing, it concludes.
>
> So nature is evolving into something more refined.
>
> Rejoice ?

**
Leaner and meaner?
**

Taller and wider, while also smaller and slimmer ?