From: Arne Vajhøj on
On 02-02-2010 15:11, Antoninus Twink wrote:
> On 31 Jan 2010 at 4:07, Arne Vajhøj wrote:
>>> When I tried this, about six or seven years ago (with the original
>>> intent of putting the program into production), it was 50-60 times
>>> slower than C (admittedly for a heavily recursive application).
>>
>> That is not in any way typical.
>>
>> It is completely off the scale for unlikelihood.
>>
>> But if I remember correct from last time you gave the story, then you
>> can not explain exactly what the code did.
>
> Richard Heathfield is a notorious comp.lang.c fantasist.
>
> It is obvious that he has never done any programming work in the real
> world - no shop I've ever known would tolerate his truculent attitude
> and his prissy refusal to step beyond a purely academic view of language
> purity and get his hands dirty with pragmatic code that might actually
> work.

I don't recognize that description.

He does not seem to have much faith in VM based runtimes.

That does not exclude programming in the real world.

Arne

From: Nick Keighley on
On 3 Feb, 00:40, Arne Vajhøj <a...(a)vajhoej.dk> wrote:
> On 02-02-2010 15:11, Antoninus Twink wrote:

[...]

> > Richard Heathfield is a notorious comp.lang.c fantasist.
>
> > It is obvious that he has never done any programming work in the real
> > world - no shop I've ever known would tolerate his truculent attitude
> > and his prissy refusal to step beyond a purely academic view of language
> > purity and get his hands dirty with pragmatic code that might actually
> > work.
>
> I don't recognize that description.
>
> He does not seem to have much faith in VM based runtimes.
>
> That does not exclude programming in the real world.

twink's a troll with a problem with Richard Heathfield.