From: moon4707 on 4 Feb 2010 00:30 I have Windows XP with SP 3. Each time MS Updates attempts to install .Net Framework 1.1, it fails. I do have on my computer later versions of .Net Framework. Should I just forget about version 1.1? Thank you.
From: Rich Barry on 4 Feb 2010 02:10 Moon, follow the advice given from Mark and Peter who responded to your post on 2/2. It worked for me. http://support.microsoft.com/kb/922377 I used Method 2. "moon4707" <moon4707(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:D64E882F-155D-4F6B-BB79-37CEAF48ABB4(a)microsoft.com... >I have Windows XP with SP 3. Each time MS Updates attempts to install .Net > Framework 1.1, it fails. I do have on my computer later versions of .Net > Framework. Should I just forget about version 1.1? Thank you.
From: MowGreen on 4 Feb 2010 16:38 Rich Barry wrote: > Moon, follow the advice given from Mark and Peter who responded to your > post on 2/2. It worked for me. > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/922377 I used Method 2. > > "moon4707"<moon4707(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:D64E882F-155D-4F6B-BB79-37CEAF48ABB4(a)microsoft.com... >> I have Windows XP with SP 3. Each time MS Updates attempts to install .Net >> Framework 1.1, it fails. I do have on my computer later versions of .Net >> Framework. Should I just forget about version 1.1? Thank you. > > Moon is another 'Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000' User who apparently was lucky to find this newsgroup again, let alone *one* response to *one* of Moon's threads. It's too bad the Full Moon is over ? <g> MowGreen ================ * -343-* FDNY Never Forgotten ================ banthecheck.com "Security updates should *never* have *non-security content* prechecked
From: moon on 6 Feb 2010 02:11 Thank you very much Rich. "Rich Barry" wrote: > Moon, follow the advice given from Mark and Peter who responded to your > post on 2/2. It worked for me. > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/922377 I used Method 2. > > "moon4707" <moon4707(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > news:D64E882F-155D-4F6B-BB79-37CEAF48ABB4(a)microsoft.com... > >I have Windows XP with SP 3. Each time MS Updates attempts to install .Net > > Framework 1.1, it fails. I do have on my computer later versions of .Net > > Framework. Should I just forget about version 1.1? Thank you. > > > . >
From: moon4707 on 8 Feb 2010 17:19 I used Method 2 to uninstall Net Framework 1.1. Everything went smoothly, including the installation of .Net Framework 2 and updates. Thanks to everyone for your help. moon "moon" wrote: > Thank you very much Rich. > > "Rich Barry" wrote: > > > Moon, follow the advice given from Mark and Peter who responded to your > > post on 2/2. It worked for me. > > http://support.microsoft.com/kb/922377 I used Method 2. > > > > "moon4707" <moon4707(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message > > news:D64E882F-155D-4F6B-BB79-37CEAF48ABB4(a)microsoft.com... > > >I have Windows XP with SP 3. Each time MS Updates attempts to install .Net > > > Framework 1.1, it fails. I do have on my computer later versions of .Net > > > Framework. Should I just forget about version 1.1? Thank you. > > > > > > . > >
|
Pages: 1 Prev: mass change shortcut target drive Next: Permanently change process priority? |