From: Chip McAllister on 29 Mar 2010 11:50 Does anyone have any information, about the 32 new connections to the database ? I'm just starting to "play" with DB2 V9.7 FP1 on UNIX, and if I activate the database, but don't connect and do a db2 list db directory, I get no connections. But when I do a db2 list application show detail, I see 40+ connections, there's 32 connections for db2fw, that I can't seem to find any information about. db2fw1 db2fw14 db2fw27 db2fw7 db2fw20 db2fw0 db2fw13 db2fw26 db2fw6 db2fw19 db2fw12 db2fw25 db2fw5 db2fw18 db2fw31 db2fw11 db2fw24 db2fw4 db2fw17 db2fw30 db2fw10 db2fw23 db2fw3 db2fw16 db2fw29 db2fw9 db2fw22 db2fw2 db2fw15 db2fw28 db2fw8 db2fw21 Any information would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Chip
From: Frederik Engelen on 29 Mar 2010 16:34 On 29 mrt, 11:50, Chip McAllister <chip.mcallis...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Does anyone have any information, about the 32 new connections to the > database ? > > I'm just starting to "play" with DB2 V9.7 FP1 on UNIX, and if I > activate the database, but don't connect and do a db2 list db > directory, I get no connections. > > But when I do a db2 list application show detail, I see 40+ > connections, there's 32 connections for db2fw, that I can't seem to > find any information about. > > db2fw1 > db2fw14 > db2fw27 > db2fw7 > db2fw20 > db2fw0 > db2fw13 > db2fw26 > db2fw6 > db2fw19 > db2fw12 > db2fw25 > db2fw5 > db2fw18 > db2fw31 > db2fw11 > db2fw24 > db2fw4 > db2fw17 > db2fw30 > db2fw10 > db2fw23 > db2fw3 > db2fw16 > db2fw29 > db2fw9 > db2fw22 > db2fw2 > db2fw15 > db2fw28 > db2fw8 > db2fw21 > > Any information would be greatly appreciated. > > Thanks, > Chip InfoCenter claims it is an "event monitor file writer". Hope that helps. -- Frederik
From: Mark A on 29 Mar 2010 17:35 "Frederik Engelen" <engelenfrederik(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:9f3b5c12-70a3-42bd-9f8e-ced7ec59024c(a)j21g2000yqh.googlegroups.com... > InfoCenter claims it is an "event monitor file writer". Hope that > helps. > > -- > Frederik Many people turn off the Health Monitor (DBM CFG) and automatic database maintenance (DB CFG).
From: Frederik Engelen on 30 Mar 2010 04:35 On Mar 29, 11:35 pm, "Mark A" <no...(a)nowhere.com> wrote: > "Frederik Engelen" <engelenfrede...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:9f3b5c12-70a3-42bd-9f8e-ced7ec59024c(a)j21g2000yqh.googlegroups.com... > > > InfoCenter claims it is an "event monitor file writer". Hope that > > helps. > > > -- > > Frederik > > Many people turn off the Health Monitor (DBM CFG) and automatic database > maintenance (DB CFG). Mark, I'm not sure how your post corresponds to mine - or Chip's. But you're more knowledgeable that I am, so is there a correlation between the event monitors and the health monitor? -- Frederik
From: Chip McAllister on 30 Mar 2010 08:32 On Mar 30, 4:35 am, Frederik Engelen <engelenfrede...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Mar 29, 11:35 pm, "Mark A" <no...(a)nowhere.com> wrote: > > > "Frederik Engelen" <engelenfrede...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > >news:9f3b5c12-70a3-42bd-9f8e-ced7ec59024c(a)j21g2000yqh.googlegroups.com.... > > > > InfoCenter claims it is an "event monitor file writer". Hope that > > > helps. > > > > -- > > > Frederik > > > Many people turn off the Health Monitor (DBM CFG) and automatic database > > maintenance (DB CFG). > > Mark, > > I'm not sure how your post corresponds to mine - or Chip's. But you're > more knowledgeable that I am, so is there a correlation between the > event monitors and the health monitor? > > -- > Frederik Thanks Everyone, I appreciate your input. Chip
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 Prev: DB2 Stored Procedure - Passing Parameter Issues Next: Location Intelligence demo |