From: Michael H. Phillips on
On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 12:07:21 +0100, J. J. Lodder wrote:

> The bigger pixels may not be an improvement over a 23" or 24" one
> if you do real work instead of just watching movies

Bigger pixels are always an improvement for weak eyes.

--
Michael

mhphillips at gmail dot com

From: J. J. Lodder on
Woody <usenet(a)alienrat.co.uk> wrote:

> J. J. Lodder <nospam(a)de-ster.demon.nl> wrote:
>
> > Eddie <efl42(a)invalid.org.uk> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Have been looking to upgrade my current 20 in dell monitor to a 24 or
> > > 26 in monitor.
> > >
> > > The new upgrade to the current Dell 2408 seems to be a long time
> > > coming and I'm still not sure if Dell have sorted some of the reported
> > > problems out.
> > >
> > > So what to get?
> > >
> > > The new Hazro (just released) looks promising - has anyone taken the
> > > plunge yet?
> >
> > Still at 1920x1200.
> > The bigger pixels may not be an improvement over a 23" or 24" one
> > if you do real work instead of just watching movies
>
> What happens if your job is a movie critic? would that not then be real
> work?

If that's work you don't need a computer screen,

Jan

From: J. J. Lodder on
Michael H. Phillips <mhp(a)odtaa.invalid> wrote:

> On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 12:07:21 +0100, J. J. Lodder wrote:
>
> > The bigger pixels may not be an improvement over a 23" or 24" one
> > if you do real work instead of just watching movies
>
> Bigger pixels are always an improvement for weak eyes.

Then buy a HD LCD TV,

Jan
From: Woody on
J. J. Lodder <nospam(a)de-ster.demon.nl> wrote:

> Woody <usenet(a)alienrat.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > J. J. Lodder <nospam(a)de-ster.demon.nl> wrote:
> >
> > > Eddie <efl42(a)invalid.org.uk> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Have been looking to upgrade my current 20 in dell monitor to a 24 or
> > > > 26 in monitor.
> > > >
> > > > The new upgrade to the current Dell 2408 seems to be a long time
> > > > coming and I'm still not sure if Dell have sorted some of the reported
> > > > problems out.
> > > >
> > > > So what to get?
> > > >
> > > > The new Hazro (just released) looks promising - has anyone taken the
> > > > plunge yet?
> > >
> > > Still at 1920x1200.
> > > The bigger pixels may not be an improvement over a 23" or 24" one
> > > if you do real work instead of just watching movies
> >
> > What happens if your job is a movie critic? would that not then be real
> > work?
>
> If that's work you don't need a computer screen,

Well, I am not a movie critic, so I can't say for sure, but I am fairly
sure that they are required to write something occasionally.


--
Woody

www.alienrat.com
From: Richard Tobin on
In article <1im3gnf.1gp5xq83wctsxN%usenet(a)alienrat.co.uk>,
Woody <usenet(a)alienrat.co.uk> wrote:

>> > > The bigger pixels may not be an improvement over a 23" or 24" one
>> > > if you do real work instead of just watching movies

>> > What happens if your job is a movie critic? would that not then be real
>> > work?

>> If that's work you don't need a computer screen,

>Well, I am not a movie critic, so I can't say for sure, but I am fairly
>sure that they are required to write something occasionally.

I think the point was that people who review movies don't watch them
on computers. If they watch them at all that is, rather than writing
what the makers bribe them to say.

-- Richard
--
Please remember to mention me / in tapes you leave behind.