From: Michael H. Phillips on 22 Aug 2008 10:51 On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 12:07:21 +0100, J. J. Lodder wrote: > The bigger pixels may not be an improvement over a 23" or 24" one > if you do real work instead of just watching movies Bigger pixels are always an improvement for weak eyes. -- Michael mhphillips at gmail dot com
From: J. J. Lodder on 22 Aug 2008 16:30 Woody <usenet(a)alienrat.co.uk> wrote: > J. J. Lodder <nospam(a)de-ster.demon.nl> wrote: > > > Eddie <efl42(a)invalid.org.uk> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Have been looking to upgrade my current 20 in dell monitor to a 24 or > > > 26 in monitor. > > > > > > The new upgrade to the current Dell 2408 seems to be a long time > > > coming and I'm still not sure if Dell have sorted some of the reported > > > problems out. > > > > > > So what to get? > > > > > > The new Hazro (just released) looks promising - has anyone taken the > > > plunge yet? > > > > Still at 1920x1200. > > The bigger pixels may not be an improvement over a 23" or 24" one > > if you do real work instead of just watching movies > > What happens if your job is a movie critic? would that not then be real > work? If that's work you don't need a computer screen, Jan
From: J. J. Lodder on 22 Aug 2008 16:30 Michael H. Phillips <mhp(a)odtaa.invalid> wrote: > On Fri, 22 Aug 2008 12:07:21 +0100, J. J. Lodder wrote: > > > The bigger pixels may not be an improvement over a 23" or 24" one > > if you do real work instead of just watching movies > > Bigger pixels are always an improvement for weak eyes. Then buy a HD LCD TV, Jan
From: Woody on 22 Aug 2008 16:53 J. J. Lodder <nospam(a)de-ster.demon.nl> wrote: > Woody <usenet(a)alienrat.co.uk> wrote: > > > J. J. Lodder <nospam(a)de-ster.demon.nl> wrote: > > > > > Eddie <efl42(a)invalid.org.uk> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Have been looking to upgrade my current 20 in dell monitor to a 24 or > > > > 26 in monitor. > > > > > > > > The new upgrade to the current Dell 2408 seems to be a long time > > > > coming and I'm still not sure if Dell have sorted some of the reported > > > > problems out. > > > > > > > > So what to get? > > > > > > > > The new Hazro (just released) looks promising - has anyone taken the > > > > plunge yet? > > > > > > Still at 1920x1200. > > > The bigger pixels may not be an improvement over a 23" or 24" one > > > if you do real work instead of just watching movies > > > > What happens if your job is a movie critic? would that not then be real > > work? > > If that's work you don't need a computer screen, Well, I am not a movie critic, so I can't say for sure, but I am fairly sure that they are required to write something occasionally. -- Woody www.alienrat.com
From: Richard Tobin on 22 Aug 2008 18:09 In article <1im3gnf.1gp5xq83wctsxN%usenet(a)alienrat.co.uk>, Woody <usenet(a)alienrat.co.uk> wrote: >> > > The bigger pixels may not be an improvement over a 23" or 24" one >> > > if you do real work instead of just watching movies >> > What happens if your job is a movie critic? would that not then be real >> > work? >> If that's work you don't need a computer screen, >Well, I am not a movie critic, so I can't say for sure, but I am fairly >sure that they are required to write something occasionally. I think the point was that people who review movies don't watch them on computers. If they watch them at all that is, rather than writing what the makers bribe them to say. -- Richard -- Please remember to mention me / in tapes you leave behind.
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: CF Card Reader question Next: Difference between Amazon and ebuyer |