From: Bruce Momjian on
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 09:03 +0200, Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
> > David E. Wheeler wrote:
> > > On Jun 15, 2010, at 3:23 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> > >
> > >> I think this project is a great idea, and I think as a community we
> > >> ought to be behind it 100%.
> > >>
> > >> However, I do wonder what happened to the original name, which IIRC
> > >> was PGAN. That seems easier to pronounce, remember, ...
> > >
> > > I didn't care for it, personally. "Pee-Gan" sounds weird to my ear. I prefer "pee-gee-ex-en." But you can go for "pixin" or "pigskin" if you'd rather. ;-)
> > >
> > > My bike shed is chartreuse,
> >
> > heh I'm with Robert on that PGXN just sounds and speels weird - PGAN was
> > much easier ;)
>
> I actually like PGXN. PGXN is marketable. Yeah that may not be what
> -hackers are after but if I stand up in front of a Fortune 500 company
> and say, "We have PGXN" it sounds a heck of a lot better that PGAN.

I think the attraction of PGAN is that people have some hope of guessing
what it means (CPAN/PGAN), and because C and G look similar, there is
even more an association, e.g. swap C and P, change C to G, and viola.

The attraction of PGXN is that it looks like PGXS.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(a)momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ None of us is going to be here forever. +

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

From: "Joshua D. Drake" on
On Wed, 2010-06-16 at 13:22 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> > I actually like PGXN. PGXN is marketable. Yeah that may not be what
> > -hackers are after but if I stand up in front of a Fortune 500 company
> > and say, "We have PGXN" it sounds a heck of a lot better that PGAN.
>
> I think the attraction of PGAN is that people have some hope of guessing
> what it means (CPAN/PGAN), and because C and G look similar, there is
> even more an association, e.g. swap C and P, change C to G, and viola.
>
> The attraction of PGXN is that it looks like PGXS.

Again, to hackers :). I am looking at this differently. If I stand up
and say,

"PostgreSQL has PGXN, the PostgreSQL Extension Network"

Versus

"PostgreSQL has PGAN, P can that Can, I am Pee gannning." What?

Anyway, a name is a name. We are PostgreSQL after all.

Joshua D. Drake


--
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 503.667.4564
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering



--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?C=E9dric_Villemain?= on
2010/6/16 David E. Wheeler <david.wheeler(a)pgexperts.com>:
> On Jun 15, 2010, at 3:23 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>
>> I think this project is a great idea, and I think as a community we
>> ought to be behind it 100%.
>>
>> However, I do wonder what happened to the original name, which IIRC
>> was PGAN. �That seems easier to pronounce, remember, ...
>
> I didn't care for it, personally. "Pee-Gan" sounds weird to my ear. I prefer "pee-gee-ex-en." But you can go for "pixin" or "pigskin" if you'd rather. ;-)
>

PGAN is very sweet in French, where PGXN is an horror

> My bike shed is chartreuse,
>
> David
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>



--
C�dric Villemain 2ndQuadrant
http://2ndQuadrant.fr/ PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers