From: Peter on
"tony cooper" <tony_cooper213(a)earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:v4j0v5l963dpdeq0pberqm3eve7brm00qj(a)4ax.com...
> On Sun, 16 May 2010 15:10:53 +0100, Bruce <docnews2011(a)gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 16 May 2010 14:48:17 +0100, Bruce <docnews2011(a)gmail.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 16 May 2010 04:56:23 -0700, Savageduck
>>><savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On 2010-05-16 01:09:03 -0700, Bruce <docnews2011(a)gmail.com> said:
>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, 15 May 2010 17:40:52 -0700, Savageduck
>>>>> <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2010-05-15 16:11:06 -0700, Bruce <docnews2011(a)gmail.com> said:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Enough of the excuses!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Where's my Tiger Woods Golf Watch?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> TAG fired Woods.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> That's *so* unfair.
>>>>
>>>>There, there. I don't think they actually fired him, they just put all
>>>>his ads in an unreachable spot on a hidden shelf.
>>>>You can still get your Roger Federer Tennis Watch, complete with tears,
>>>>petulant frenzy, and over inflated ego.
>>>
>>>
>>>No, that won't do. I want a wider choice of (allaged) ex-mistresses.
>>
>>
>>Oops. Should be "alleged". Allegedly.
>
> The ex-mistresses are not alleged. They are real. What is alleged is
> that they were Tiger's mistresses.
>


It is the claim of the mistresses, not a third party allegation.

A mistress is something the comes between a mister and a mattress.

--
Peter

From: tony cooper on
On Sun, 16 May 2010 19:29:22 -0400, "Peter"
<peternew(a)nospamoptonline.net> wrote:

>"tony cooper" <tony_cooper213(a)earthlink.net> wrote in message
>news:v4j0v5l963dpdeq0pberqm3eve7brm00qj(a)4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 16 May 2010 15:10:53 +0100, Bruce <docnews2011(a)gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 16 May 2010 14:48:17 +0100, Bruce <docnews2011(a)gmail.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Sun, 16 May 2010 04:56:23 -0700, Savageduck
>>>><savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On 2010-05-16 01:09:03 -0700, Bruce <docnews2011(a)gmail.com> said:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, 15 May 2010 17:40:52 -0700, Savageduck
>>>>>> <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2010-05-15 16:11:06 -0700, Bruce <docnews2011(a)gmail.com> said:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Enough of the excuses!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Where's my Tiger Woods Golf Watch?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> TAG fired Woods.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's *so* unfair.
>>>>>
>>>>>There, there. I don't think they actually fired him, they just put all
>>>>>his ads in an unreachable spot on a hidden shelf.
>>>>>You can still get your Roger Federer Tennis Watch, complete with tears,
>>>>>petulant frenzy, and over inflated ego.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>No, that won't do. I want a wider choice of (allaged) ex-mistresses.
>>>
>>>
>>>Oops. Should be "alleged". Allegedly.
>>
>> The ex-mistresses are not alleged. They are real. What is alleged is
>> that they were Tiger's mistresses.
>>
>
>
>It is the claim of the mistresses, not a third party allegation.
>
They are the one who are alleging. I think Tiger has been to more
than three parties.

--
Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida