Prev: SELECT * in a CREATE VIEW statement doesn't update column set automatically
Next: [HACKERS] New buildfarm client release
From: Jaime Casanova on 17 May 2010 20:10 On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(a)dunslane.net> wrote: > > I have just released version 4.0 of the PostgreSQL Buildfarm client. > > There are two new features: > >  * The SCM code is substantially rearranged into a separate OO >   module, with subclasses supporting CVS and Git. New config options >   support these changes, while old style config parameters for CVS >   are still supported. Support for running the buildfarm from Git is >   a requirement before we can move the core community repo, and this >   meets that requirement (a little later than planned, but as >   promised almost exactly one year ago). maybe i'm not understanding but this will be able to build specific branches so we can have some experimental code running in buildfarm? -- Jaime Casanova www.2ndQuadrant.com Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
From: Andrew Dunstan on 17 May 2010 20:31
Jaime Casanova wrote: > On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(a)dunslane.net> wrote: > >> I have just released version 4.0 of the PostgreSQL Buildfarm client. >> >> There are two new features: >> >> * The SCM code is substantially rearranged into a separate OO >> module, with subclasses supporting CVS and Git. New config options >> support these changes, while old style config parameters for CVS >> are still supported. Support for running the buildfarm from Git is >> a requirement before we can move the core community repo, and this >> meets that requirement (a little later than planned, but as >> promised almost exactly one year ago). >> > > maybe i'm not understanding but this will be able to build specific > branches so we can have some experimental code running in buildfarm? > > The code can build and report on any branch that exists in the upstream repository. But I don't want to accept reports on private branches on the buildfarm server, at least on the dashboard. It's a subject worth thinking about, though. The branches that are built are controlled by the client owners, not by me. That's the way things are in a distributed world -;) cheers andrew -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers |