From: Miroslav Lachman on 10 Nov 2009 12:09 Doug Ambrisko wrote: > Sean McAfee writes: > | Frank J. Laszlo wrote: > |> Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > |>> Vladimir Ermakov wrote: > |>> > |>>> Hi, all. > |>>> please appreciate my port *megacli* > |>>> > |>>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=133655 > |>>> > |>> > |>> Is that different from this the port, is it an update? > |>> > |>> Path: /usr/ports/sysutils/linux-megacli > |> > |> Since the megacli application now has a native binary, should be not > |> DEPRICATE the linux version? > |> > |> Regards, > |> Frank Laszlo > | > | Probably not. I noted this when I originally filed the PR for > | linux-megacli2, but the 1.x, 2.x, and 4.x versions support dramatically > | different hardware lines. > | > | As an example, this native version is 4.x and does not support the Dell > | PERC5. > > I find this hard to believe and in my experience with a fresh download > from LSI's web-site the FreeBSD and Linux variants work just fine > on my PERC5's for things like -AdpAllInfo. There is no real firmware > interface difference between between the PERC5 and PERC6. So I don't > know where you get this from. Specifics in which things are broken > could be nice so I can look at getting them fixed. I put in the > management ioctl path that they use into FreeBSD a long time ago. > They did find some bugs in some new management features that are > fixed in 7.1 and I need to merge back to 6. Unfortunately, this work > happened after the last 6.X version was released :-( > > | IMO, linux-megacli, linux-megacli2, and megacli should all exist as > | independent ports. > > I would say not. Let's get rid of the Linux variant and use the FreeBSD > native ones. The FreeBSD should be a lot easier to run then the > Linux one and won't have the potential NFS hang issue that Linux does. > > It's nice to see the FreeBSD version and would be interesting to see > how much my hand was involved in that ... > > My employer's FreeBSD native tool works across all of the MegaRAID SAS > type cards and Dell servers that I've tried which pre-dates the MegaCLI > for FreeBSD. Prior versions of MegaCLI also did. I can't say I've > tried all options with the latest MegaCLI. Hi, I am little confused by all these MegaRAID utilities available in ports. (I am new to LSI MegaRAID). I have new Dell R610 with PERC6 identified as: mfi0: <Dell PERC 6> port 0xfc00-0xfcff mem 0xdf180000-0xdf1bffff,0xdf1c0000-0xdf1fffff irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci3 mfi0: Megaraid SAS driver Ver 3.00 What is the recommended tool to monitor (and manage) the state of the PERC6 array? I also found on LSI website, that newer FreeBSD MegaCli is available: 5.00.15 But I don't know if it supports previous HW or not. 4.00.11 Release Date: 02/19/2009 MegaRAID SAS 8704ELP MegaRAID SAS 8704EM2 MegaRAID SAS 8708ELP MegaRAID SAS 8708EM2 MegaRAID SAS 8880EM2 MegaRAID SAS 8888ELP 5.00.15 Release Date: 10/20/2009 MegaRAID SAS 9260-4i MegaRAID SAS 9260-8i MegaRAID SAS 9260DE-8i MegaRAID SAS 9280-8e MegaRAID SAS 9280DE-8e I don't know if later is addition to previous list or if it is exclusive list. Will current sysutils/megacli be updated to 5.00.15? Miroslav Lachman _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org"
From: Sean McAfee on 10 Nov 2009 13:06 Doug Ambrisko wrote: > Sean McAfee writes: > | Frank J. Laszlo wrote: > | > Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > | >> Vladimir Ermakov wrote: > | >> > | >>> Hi, all. > | >>> please appreciate my port *megacli* > | >>> > | >>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=133655 > | >>> > | >> > | >> Is that different from this the port, is it an update? > | >> > | >> Path: /usr/ports/sysutils/linux-megacli > | > > | > Since the megacli application now has a native binary, should be not > | > DEPRICATE the linux version? > | > > | > Regards, > | > Frank Laszlo > | > | Probably not. I noted this when I originally filed the PR for > | linux-megacli2, but the 1.x, 2.x, and 4.x versions support dramatically > | different hardware lines. > | > | As an example, this native version is 4.x and does not support the Dell > | PERC5. > > I find this hard to believe and in my experience with a fresh download > from LSI's web-site the FreeBSD and Linux variants work just fine > on my PERC5's for things like -AdpAllInfo. There is no real firmware > interface difference between between the PERC5 and PERC6. So I don't > know where you get this from. Specifics in which things are broken > could be nice so I can look at getting them fixed. I put in the > management ioctl path that they use into FreeBSD a long time ago. > They did find some bugs in some new management features that are > fixed in 7.1 and I need to merge back to 6. Unfortunately, this work > happened after the last 6.X version was released :-( Sorry, I missed this reply originally, but it is a 6 vs. 7 issue. On 6.3p9 (MegaCli is native, megacli is linux-): [smcafee(a)web01 ~]$ sudo MegaCli -AdpAllInfo -aALL Exit Code: 0x00 [smcafee(a)web01 ~]$ sudo megacli -AdpAllInfo -aALL Adapter #0 ============================================================================== Versions ================ Product Name : PERC 5/i Integrated Serial No : 12345 FW Package Build: 5.2.2-0072 ..... What's the ports@ policy for things like this? I know I'm pretty peeved that openntpd was pushed to 4.x, which requires >7. Fresh installs of 6.x require me to pkg_create from a donor system or come up with a backdated ports tree and I really don't want megacli to be in the same boat. -- Sean McAfee System Engineer _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org"
From: Doug Ambrisko on 10 Nov 2009 14:41 Miroslav Lachman writes: | Doug Ambrisko wrote: | > Sean McAfee writes: | > | Frank J. Laszlo wrote: | > |> Philip M. Gollucci wrote: | > |>> Vladimir Ermakov wrote: | > |>> | > |>>> Hi, all. | > |>>> please appreciate my port *megacli* | > |>>> | > |>>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=133655 | > |>>> | > |>> | > |>> Is that different from this the port, is it an update? | > |>> | > |>> Path: /usr/ports/sysutils/linux-megacli | > |> | > |> Since the megacli application now has a native binary, should be not | > |> DEPRICATE the linux version? | > |> | > |> Regards, | > |> Frank Laszlo | > | | > | Probably not. I noted this when I originally filed the PR for | > | linux-megacli2, but the 1.x, 2.x, and 4.x versions support dramatically | > | different hardware lines. | > | | > | As an example, this native version is 4.x and does not support the Dell | > | PERC5. | > | > I find this hard to believe and in my experience with a fresh download | > from LSI's web-site the FreeBSD and Linux variants work just fine | > on my PERC5's for things like -AdpAllInfo. There is no real firmware | > interface difference between between the PERC5 and PERC6. So I don't | > know where you get this from. Specifics in which things are broken | > could be nice so I can look at getting them fixed. I put in the | > management ioctl path that they use into FreeBSD a long time ago. | > They did find some bugs in some new management features that are | > fixed in 7.1 and I need to merge back to 6. Unfortunately, this work | > happened after the last 6.X version was released :-( | > | > | IMO, linux-megacli, linux-megacli2, and megacli should all exist as | > | independent ports. | > | > I would say not. Let's get rid of the Linux variant and use the FreeBSD | > native ones. The FreeBSD should be a lot easier to run then the | > Linux one and won't have the potential NFS hang issue that Linux does. | > | > It's nice to see the FreeBSD version and would be interesting to see | > how much my hand was involved in that ... | > | > My employer's FreeBSD native tool works across all of the MegaRAID SAS | > type cards and Dell servers that I've tried which pre-dates the MegaCLI | > for FreeBSD. Prior versions of MegaCLI also did. I can't say I've | > tried all options with the latest MegaCLI. | | Hi, | I am little confused by all these MegaRAID utilities available in ports. | (I am new to LSI MegaRAID). | | I have new Dell R610 with PERC6 identified as: | | mfi0: <Dell PERC 6> port 0xfc00-0xfcff mem | 0xdf180000-0xdf1bffff,0xdf1c0000-0xdf1fffff irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci3 | mfi0: Megaraid SAS driver Ver 3.00 | | What is the recommended tool to monitor (and manage) the state of the | PERC6 array? To monitor, I use syslog :-). I set in loader.conf hw.mfi.event_class="-2" so I see everything logged to dmesg/syslog of all events. To manage it I use a custom tool but MegaCli should work. There is a new tool that was added to freebsd "mfiutil" from Yahoo. | I also found on LSI website, that newer FreeBSD MegaCli is available: | 5.00.15 | | But I don't know if it supports previous HW or not. I have yet to see a MegaCli that isn't a super set of the prior. The API to the firmware has been stable. | 4.00.11 | Release Date: 02/19/2009 | MegaRAID SAS 8704ELP | MegaRAID SAS 8704EM2 | MegaRAID SAS 8708ELP | MegaRAID SAS 8708EM2 | MegaRAID SAS 8880EM2 | MegaRAID SAS 8888ELP | | 5.00.15 | Release Date: 10/20/2009 | MegaRAID SAS 9260-4i | MegaRAID SAS 9260-8i | MegaRAID SAS 9260DE-8i | MegaRAID SAS 9280-8e | MegaRAID SAS 9280DE-8e | | I don't know if later is addition to previous list or if it is exclusive | list. | | Will current sysutils/megacli be updated to 5.00.15? I don't know, since I'm not a ports committer anymore but it should work. Doug A. _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org"
From: Mark Linimon on 11 Nov 2009 12:22 On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 01:06:26PM -0500, Sean McAfee wrote: > What's the ports@ policy for things like this? I know I'm pretty peeved > that openntpd was pushed to 4.x, which requires >7. In a perfect world, I'd prefer for someone to fix the newer port on 6. However, it's fair to note that 6 is only a year away from secteam EOL (6.3 in January, 6.4 in November) and not much development is going on there. So, I think it's fair to ask maintainers to keep things working on 7 and 8, and 6 only if they have time. (Ports on -HEAD currently need a lot of work, too.) mcl _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org"
From: Miroslav Lachman on 12 Nov 2009 17:20 Doug Ambrisko wrote: > Miroslav Lachman writes: > | Doug Ambrisko wrote: [...] > | Hi, > | I am little confused by all these MegaRAID utilities available in ports. > | (I am new to LSI MegaRAID). > | > | I have new Dell R610 with PERC6 identified as: > | > | mfi0:<Dell PERC 6> port 0xfc00-0xfcff mem > | 0xdf180000-0xdf1bffff,0xdf1c0000-0xdf1fffff irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci3 > | mfi0: Megaraid SAS driver Ver 3.00 > | > | What is the recommended tool to monitor (and manage) the state of the > | PERC6 array? > > To monitor, I use syslog :-). I set in loader.conf > hw.mfi.event_class="-2" > so I see everything logged to dmesg/syslog of all events. > > To manage it I use a custom tool but MegaCli should work. > > There is a new tool that was added to freebsd "mfiutil" from Yahoo. Thank you for tip to mfiutil. I upgraded to 7-STABLE where mfiutil is also included and it seems simpler than MegaCli. I hope it will work without problems ;) > | I also found on LSI website, that newer FreeBSD MegaCli is available: > | 5.00.15 > | > | But I don't know if it supports previous HW or not. > > I have yet to see a MegaCli that isn't a super set of the prior. > The API to the firmware has been stable. [...] Miroslav Lachman _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org"
|
Pages: 1 Prev: RFC: svn for make fetch Next: Problem using portupgrade-devel |