New theory of gravity
in [Physics]
|
Prev: fundamental representations
Next: heavy water in comets is already proof Re: Additive Creation; Dirac's new radioactivities Chapt 5 #169; ATOM TOTALITY
From: Rock Brentwood on 21 Jun 2010 17:49 On Jun 15, 2:27 pm, GogoJF <jfgog...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > According to my new theory, larger objects fall more slowly than > smaller objects. It falls faster, not slower. For instance, if one object is the mass of a small rock, it will fall with an acceleration of around 9.8 meters/second^2 near the surface of the Earth. If the other object, on the other hand, is the mass of the sun, it and the Earth will fall into each other at a much greater acceleration -- namely that which corresponds to the acceleration of gravity that would be encountered around an object the mass of the sun at a distance from its center of gravity equal to the distance of the Earth's center to the object's center of gravity. (Never mind the extreme tidal effects). According to your theory, if you stick a planet the size and mass of the Earth near the sun, the sun will never fall into the Earth-like planet (i.e., the two bodies will never fall into each other) because the sun's mass would be way beyond that threshold where you deemed objects would no longer be acted on by the Earth's gravity.
From: Androcles on 21 Jun 2010 19:04 "Rock Brentwood" <federation2005(a)netzero.com> wrote in message news:eb4c3216-768d-43ee-8471-442a3b183266(a)i31g2000yqm.googlegroups.com... On Jun 15, 2:27 pm, GogoJF <jfgog...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > According to my new theory, larger objects fall more slowly than > smaller objects. It falls faster, not slower. ----------------------------------------- No. It's his theory, he can make it do whatever he wants and you haven't shown otherwise, you stupid snipping prick.
From: Sam on 21 Jun 2010 23:36
On Jun 15, 3:13 pm, GogoJF <jfgog...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Jun 15, 2:48 pm, Sam <sworml...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jun 15, 2:27 pm, GogoJF <jfgog...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > I propose a new theory of gravity. According to conventional theory, > > > two objects of different weight, dropped off a tower, will land at > > > precisely the same time. > > > > According to my new theory, the two objects only appear to land at the > > > same time because, in reference to the size of the Earth, the two > > > different weighted objects are virtually the same weight when compared > > > to the size of the Earth. > > > > According to my new theory, larger objects fall more slowly than > > > smaller objects. As objects become larger and larger, and finally can > > > be compared to the size of the Earth, these objects will begin to fall > > > more slowly. > > > Your new theory is contradicted by observation. > > In this case, the results of the observation obscure the truth of the > situation. How so? Measurement is the final arbiter. |