New utf8string design may make UTF-8 the superior encoding
in [MFC]
|
From: Mihai N. on 20 May 2010 03:03 > Design never proves anything with regards to speed, at least as > long as the big-O is the same. Not to mention that big-O tells you something only for relatively big values of 'n' (how big is 'big' depends on the algorithm). -- Mihai Nita [Microsoft MVP, Visual C++] http://www.mihai-nita.net ------------------------------------------ Replace _year_ with _ to get the real email
From: gwowen on 20 May 2010 03:10 On May 20, 5:13 am, "Pete Delgado" <Peter.Delg...(a)NoSpam.com> wrote: > > All in all, very misleading. Also, competitor's products actually exist and don't feature a download-less "Download" page written in the future tense. No code = no product.
From: Oliver Regenfelder on 20 May 2010 05:49 Hello, Peter Olcott wrote: > Yes and quite often with zero percent accuracy at screen resolutions. > The most accurate alternative system scored about 25% accuracy on the > sample image and was 872-fold slower. You're sure it wasn't 872.3-fold slower? Best regards, Oliver
From: Hector Santos on 20 May 2010 06:19 On May 20, 5:49 am, Oliver Regenfelder <oliver.regenfel...(a)gmx.at> wrote: > Hello, > > Peter Olcott wrote: > > Yes and quite often with zero percent accuracy at screen resolutions. > > The most accurate alternative system scored about 25% accuracy on the > > sample image and was 872-fold slower. > > You're sure it wasn't 872.3-fold slower? > > Best regards, > > Oliver HA, I writing a patent on flying to the moon in under pie seconds! It works by closing your eyes and dreaming! VOILA, you're on the moon! :)
From: thomas on 20 May 2010 07:17
On May 20, 6:19 pm, Hector Santos <sant9...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On May 20, 5:49 am, Oliver Regenfelder <oliver.regenfel...(a)gmx.at> > wrote: > > > Hello, > > > Peter Olcott wrote: > > > Yes and quite often with zero percent accuracy at screen resolutions. > > > The most accurate alternative system scored about 25% accuracy on the > > > sample image and was 872-fold slower. > > > You're sure it wasn't 872.3-fold slower? > > > Best regards, > > > Oliver > > HA, I writing a patent on flying to the moon in under pie seconds! > > It works by closing your eyes and dreaming! VOILA, you're on the > moon! :) XD |