Prev: Now OK (Re: cvs commit: ports/print/panda/files patch-images.c)
Next: "stable" ports?
From: Christian Weisgerber on 29 Mar 2010 11:23
We only have autoconf 2.13 and 2.62 in the tree. Upstream authors
are increasingly moving towards and _requiring_ newer versions
(2.63, 2.64, 2.65), and if you have to run autoconf, that is a
problem. Are there any plans to provide a newer autoconf version?

--
Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy(a)mips.inka.de

_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org"

From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu on 29 Mar 2010 11:26
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010 15:23:48 +0000 (UTC)
naddy(a)mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber) wrote:

> We only have autoconf 2.13 and 2.62 in the tree. Upstream authors
> are increasingly moving towards and _requiring_ newer versions
> (2.63, 2.64, 2.65), and if you have to run autoconf, that is a
> problem. Are there any plans to provide a newer autoconf version?

Yes, it's in work, but won't be ready before at least a month.

--
IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
"Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect"
FreeBSD committer -> itetcu(a)FreeBSD.org, PGP Key ID 057E9F8B493A297B
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Now OK (Re: cvs commit: ports/print/panda/files patch-images.c)
Next: "stable" ports?