Prev: making a better 3d tv?
Next: Come on creative minds solve this fiasco in the Gulf of Mexico if you can
From: Xaustein on 30 May 2010 07:56
There are plenty of videos of Nassin Haramein that I liked:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UK7eWEUwRDg

What about this?

In the video, we are told that according to the calculations (in these
calculations
use the Newtonian gravitational force as 1 / r ^ 2) the passage of
the
comet near the Sun so would have disturbed the orbit of
Mercury that Mercury would have fallen (precipitated) to the Sun
following the comet, also would have significantly altered the orbit
of the Earth to the point of destroying civilization in
land (either things have happened.)

There are many chances that the same calculations using force
gravitational Catacroc as 1 / r ^ 3, can explain why
terrestrial civilization has been destroyed ....

The video tells us that the comet changed (drifted) its
trajectory toward the Sun at the time the sun solar flare
toward the comet.

I think I see the turning of the comet in an example of the
trajectories
conicicloides with "catacroc", besides being obviously the flash
Solar another manifestation of the "catacroc."

There is a steady state for the momentum and another for the kinetic
energy, the momentum to depend on the speed may be positive or
negative sign, while the kinetic energy to depend on the square of the
velocity can only be positive. Also in the Universe can not happen
ever stereo than the speed of momentum is greater (in absolute value)
that the speed of kinetic energy, where, owing to the gravitational
field is impossible to produce this result, the momentum completely
reverses sign. In other words, the body bounces in a vacuum.

It is precisely this rebound comet "in vacuum" which is seen in above
video.

Greetings.
From: Xaustein on 30 May 2010 07:57
On 30 mayo, 13:56, Xaustein <gx...(a)xtec.net> wrote:
> There are plenty of videos of Nassin Haramein that I liked:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UK7eWEUwRDg
>
> What about this?
>
> In the video, we are told that according to the calculations (in these
> calculations
> use the Newtonian gravitational force as 1 / r ^ 2) the passage of
> the
> comet near the Sun so would have disturbed the orbit of
> Mercury that Mercury would have fallen (precipitated) to the Sun
> following the comet, also would have significantly altered the orbit
> of the Earth to the point of destroying civilization in
> land (either things have happened.)
>
> There are many chances that the same calculations using force
> gravitational Catacroc as 1 / r ^ 3, can explain why
> terrestrial civilization has been destroyed ....
>
> The video tells us that the comet changed (drifted) its
> trajectory toward the Sun at the time the sun solar flare
> toward the comet.
>
> I think I see the turning of the comet in an example of the
> trajectories
> conicicloides with "catacroc", besides being obviously the flash
> Solar another manifestation of the "catacroc."
>
> There is a steady state for the momentum and another for the kinetic
> energy, the momentum to depend on the speed may be positive or
> negative sign, while the kinetic energy to depend on the square of the
> velocity can only be positive. Also in the Universe can not happen
> ever stereo than the speed of momentum is greater (in absolute value)
> that the speed of kinetic energy, where, owing to the gravitational
> field is impossible to produce this result, the momentum completely
> reverses sign. In other words, the body bounces in a vacuum.
>
> It is precisely this rebound comet "in vacuum" which is seen in above
> video.
>
> Greetings.

Hay bastantes videos de Nassin Haramein que me han gustado:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UK7eWEUwRDg

¿Qué os parece éste?

En el video, se nos dice que según los cálculos (en dichos cálculos
de
usa la fuerza gravitatoria Newtoniana como 1/r^2) el paso de dicho
cometa cerca del Sol habría perturbado de tal manera la órbita de
Mercurio que Mercurio habría caido (precipitado) hacia el Sol
siguiendo al cometa, además se habría alterado notablemente la órbita
de la Tierra hasta el extremo de destruir la civilización en la
superficie terrestre (ninguna de las dos cosas han ocurrido).

Hay muchas probabilidades de que los mismos cálculos usando la fuerza
gravitatoria del Catacroc como 1/r^3, se pueda explicar el porqué la
civilización terrestre no ha sido destruida ....

En el video se nos dice que el cometa cambió (se desvió) su
trayectoria hacia el Sol al producirse la llamarada solar del Sol
hacia el cometa.

Yo creo ver en el desvio del cometa una ejemplo de las trayectorias
conicicloides con "catacroc", además de ser evidentemente la
llamarada
solar una manifestación más de dicho "catacroc".

Hay una constante de estado para el momento lineal y otra distinta
para la energía cinética, el momento lineal al depender de la
velocidad puede tener signo positivo o negativo, mientras que la
enegía cinética al depender del cuadrado de la velocidad únicamente
puede tener valor positivo. Además en el Universo estéreo no puede
producirse nunca que la velocidad del momento lineal sea mayor (en
valor absoluto) que la velocidad de la energía cinética, cuando debido
al campo gravitatorio se produciría dicho resultado imposible, el
momento lineal se invierte completamente de signo. O sea, el cuerpo
"rebota" en el vacío.

Pues es precisamente este rebote del cometa "en el vacio" lo que se
observa en susodicho video.

Saludos.
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: making a better 3d tv?
Next: Come on creative minds solve this fiasco in the Gulf of Mexico if you can