Newton's law of gravitational attraction
in [Physics]
|
Prev: New Volcanic Activity This Week- Three~~ Total 16 active
Next: Solutions manual to Intermediate Accounting 13e Kieso
From: Autymn D. C. on 16 Feb 2010 03:09 On Jan 30, 2:10 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > On Jan 27, 2:40 am, "Autymn D. C." <lysde...(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: > > > On Jan 13, 3:15 pm, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Jan 13, 4:04 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > > (according to the SR equation) > > > > The SR equation doesn't say that at all. > > > > Where on earth did you get the impression that the area of the curve > > > you're looking at represents the fraction of the energy of the > > > universe???? What on earth are you looking at? > > > He faild calculus after dimensional analýsis.  Ev â E.. > > plot the SR equation and look at the area under the curve.  Most of > that area occurs BEFORE reaching .95 'c'.  So, most of the energy in > the Universe would be used up in causing any small mass to reach such > velocity.  Of course, I've disproved SR.  No "sics" are needed, just > common sense!  â NE â The area isn't energhy, cretin.
From: PD on 16 Feb 2010 11:13 On Feb 8, 2:46 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > On Feb 1, 9:38 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: It would be great if a couch potato like > you would find other uses for your time than pretending to be an > expert on physics. Your only expertise is in side-stepping the truth > and escaping into your own delusions of the vagueness in science. > There is little that is vague about REAL science truths. NoEinstein > Sorry, NoEinstein, but if you don't want answers to questions, don't ask them in a public forum. If you only want to talk and not have to listen, write a blog. > > > > Well, NoEinstein, you wanted some answers to basic questions about > > physics and I've given them to you. Now it appears you never wanted > > them in the first place. It seems you don't know what you want, do you? > >
From: glird on 21 Feb 2010 12:45
On Feb 16, 11:13 am, PD <thedraperfam...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Feb 8, 2:46 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...(a)bellsouth.net> wrote: > > > Dear PD, the Parasite Dunce: It would be great if a couch potato like > > you would find other uses for your time than pretending to be an > > expert on physics. Your only expertise is in side-stepping the truth > > and escaping into your own delusions of the vagueness in science. > > There is little that is vague about REAL science truths. NoEinstein > > Sorry, NoEinstein, but if you don't want answers to questions, don't > ask them in a public forum. > If you only want to talk and not have to listen, write a blog. And if you do, be sure to sign it as dyslexic(a)sbcglobal.net or Androcles or by your real name John Walker. |