From: Conor on 20 Apr 2010 17:55 On 20/04/2010 19:12, Jaimie Vandenbergh wrote: > On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 18:32:07 +0100, Conor<conor(a)gmx.co.uk> wrote: > >> On 20/04/2010 17:36, Rob wrote: >>> Because: "We don�t support Macs because of problems with authentication >>> and security", according to our (university) IT tech people. >>> >>> I could understand the support argument, but security and authentication? >>> >> Yes. They can't push patches and it relies on the user doing them rather >> than them having a policy on that workstation/desktop/laptop which >> allows them to push an update. > > That's not correct, there are indeed Apple tools to do patches and > updates automatically and remotely. > Yes, all well and good but if its a Windows only house... > This particular IT dept presumably won't have them though... > >> Windows is actually quite good in this >> respect from an administration point of view. > > Yup. And Apple too it would seem which is something I've learned today. -- Conor I'm not prejudiced. I hate everyone equally.
From: Gordon on 21 Apr 2010 04:31 On Apr 20, 5:36 pm, Rob <patchoulianREM...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Because: "We dont support Macs because of problems with authentication > and security", according to our (university) IT tech people. > > I could understand the support argument, but security and authentication? > > I'd asked if I could have access to a Mac to do some blunt editing of a > pdf - they're installing Acrobat Pro on the work PC. > > Rob Because Adobe software doesn't have any security issues associated with it at all :) Sounds like your IT staff are a) Mac haters, b) incompetent to do the job or c) both
From: Jaimie Vandenbergh on 21 Apr 2010 05:13 On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 22:55:19 +0100, Conor <conor(a)gmx.co.uk> wrote: >On 20/04/2010 19:12, Jaimie Vandenbergh wrote: >> On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 18:32:07 +0100, Conor<conor(a)gmx.co.uk> wrote: >> >>> On 20/04/2010 17:36, Rob wrote: >>>> Because: "We don�t support Macs because of problems with authentication >>>> and security", according to our (university) IT tech people. >>>> >>>> I could understand the support argument, but security and authentication? >>>> >>> Yes. They can't push patches and it relies on the user doing them rather >>> than them having a policy on that workstation/desktop/laptop which >>> allows them to push an update. >> >> That's not correct, there are indeed Apple tools to do patches and >> updates automatically and remotely. >> >Yes, all well and good but if its a Windows only house... .... then they won't let Macs on the network. And the circle is complete. >> This particular IT dept presumably won't have them though... >> >>> Windows is actually quite good in this >>> respect from an administration point of view. >> >> Yup. > >And Apple too it would seem which is something I've learned today. The Apple tools are solid for remote admin/updates/patches/OS configuration/proxy information and so on, but nothing like as detailed in the user control area (Group Policy type stuff). Cheers - Jaimie -- "Heisenberg may have slept here"
From: Conor on 21 Apr 2010 06:12 On 21/04/2010 10:13, Jaimie Vandenbergh wrote: > The Apple tools are solid for remote admin/updates/patches/OS > configuration/proxy information and so on, but nothing like as > detailed in the user control area (Group Policy type stuff). > I'll have a google and have a play. -- Conor I'm not prejudiced. I hate everyone equally.
From: Jaimie Vandenbergh on 21 Apr 2010 06:22 On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 11:12:53 +0100, Conor <conor(a)gmx.co.uk> wrote: >On 21/04/2010 10:13, Jaimie Vandenbergh wrote: > >> The Apple tools are solid for remote admin/updates/patches/OS >> configuration/proxy information and so on, but nothing like as >> detailed in the user control area (Group Policy type stuff). >> > >I'll have a google and have a play. http://www.apple.com/remotedesktop/newfeatures.html and related is your first stop. Cheers - Jaimie -- "Shellfish are the prime cause of the decline of morals and the adoption of an extravagant life style" -- Pliny the Elder
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Prev: Next generation iPhone found and dismantled! Next: Airport Express alternative? |