Note 1. ECMAScript. Bound functions.
in [JavaScript]
|
From: Garrett Smith on 22 Jun 2010 15:14 On 2010-06-21 01:27 PM, Garrett Smith wrote: > On 2010-06-19 01:03 PM, Garrett Smith wrote: >> On 2010-06-17 05:42 PM, Garrett Smith wrote: >>> On 6/17/2010 4:35 PM, Benjamin 'BeRo' Rosseaux wrote: >>>> Am 15.06.2010 09:00, schrieb Garrett Smith: >>>> >> [...] >>> >>> | Yet others, notably DMDScript and default configuration of BESEN, >>> | throw a SyntaxError. >>> >> >> I'll be updating the post early next week with this info, unless >> somebody has something they want to add. >> > > After reviewing, I decided that the fact of three different known interpreations was not explicitly stated. Since this is an important point, I added it. > > "Code that uses function statement has three known interpretations." > > The proposed text, so far is this: > +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ [...] > +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ > I've updated the entry: http://jibbering.com/faq/#functionStatement Changes made were based on comments from Asen (via Twitter) and Benjamin Rosseaux reflecting behavior in BESEN and DMDScript. Garrett
From: John G Harris on 24 Jun 2010 10:21
On Tue, 22 Jun 2010 at 12:14:49, in comp.lang.javascript, Garrett Smith wrote: >On 2010-06-21 01:27 PM, Garrett Smith wrote: <snip> >> >> After reviewing, I decided that the fact of three different known >>interpreations was not explicitly stated. Since this is an important >>point, I added it. >> >> "Code that uses function statement has three known interpretations." >> >> The proposed text, so far is this: >> +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ >[...] >> +----------------------------------------------------------------------+ >> > >I've updated the entry: http://jibbering.com/faq/#functionStatement You allowed only 23 hours for comments to be made in reply to your revised proposal. Might I draw your attention to item 1.4 in the FAQ. >Changes made were based on comments from Asen (via Twitter) and >Benjamin Rosseaux reflecting behavior in BESEN and DMDScript. Is c.l.j no longer good enough for comments on the FAQ? Was this comment sensible or nonsense? Will it be archived in Google Groups? John -- John Harris |