Notion of Absolute Clock Synchronization in SR
in [Relativity]
|
From: Androcles on 13 May 2010 07:59 <valls(a)icmf.inf.cu> wrote in message news:373de4ee-5965-4ae9-9f79-e89674d8e5e1(a)k29g2000yqh.googlegroups.com... > He simply called the ensemble (x,y,z,t) a "system of values". > Where t has a different from (x,y,z) physical dimension in all common unit systems. > Regards, > Harald Your comments are very appreciated by me. RVHG (Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato) =========================================== He called the ensemble (x',y,z,t) a system of values, which is syntactic nonsense. http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/syntax
From: Androcles on 18 May 2010 18:45 <valls(a)icmf.inf.cu> wrote in message news:a0b2912c-81ea-4a90-9be5-ac82a7224142(a)f14g2000vbn.googlegroups.com... Einstein is right saying that x�, y, z are the three independent of time. You are totally wrong saying that x, y and z are INFEPENDENT OF TIME, because the coordinate x is DEPENDENT of the time t. ================================================== Bwahahahahahahahaha! Too funny! Libertad para los 5 x' s, los dej� vaga !
From: valls on 19 May 2010 06:30 On 18 mayo, 17:45, "Androcles" <Headmas...(a)Hogwarts.physics_z> wrote: > <va...(a)icmf.inf.cu> wrote in message > > news:a0b2912c-81ea-4a90-9be5-ac82a7224142(a)f14g2000vbn.googlegroups.com... > > Einstein is right saying that x, y, z are the three independent of > time. > You are totally wrong saying that x, y and z are INFEPENDENT OF TIME, > because the coordinate x is DEPENDENT of the time t. > > ================================================== > Bwahahahahahahahaha! > Too funny! > Libertad para los 5 x' s, los dejó vaga ! You seem now totally unable to correct even your own rather trivial errors. If you return in the future to normal scientist behaviour, I remain open (as had being always the case in the past) to contact with you. RVHG (Rafael Valls Hidalgo-Gato)
From: Androcles on 19 May 2010 06:41 <valls(a)icmf.inf.cu> wrote in message news:2c77619d-c382-41ab-8f7e-f6a1e600303c(a)o15g2000vbb.googlegroups.com... On 18 mayo, 17:45, "Androcles" <Headmas...(a)Hogwarts.physics_z> wrote: > <va...(a)icmf.inf.cu> wrote in message > > news:a0b2912c-81ea-4a90-9be5-ac82a7224142(a)f14g2000vbn.googlegroups.com... > > Einstein is right saying that x�, y, z are the three independent of > time. > You are totally wrong saying that x, y and z are INFEPENDENT OF TIME, > because the coordinate x is DEPENDENT of the time t. > > ================================================== > Bwahahahahahahahaha! > Too funny! > Libertad para los 5 x' s, los dej� vaga ! You seem now totally unable ======================================== usted duende loco comunista ignorante del idiota.
From: blackhead on 20 May 2010 16:09
On 19 May, 11:41, "Androcles" <Headmas...(a)Hogwarts.physics_z> wrote: > <va...(a)icmf.inf.cu> wrote in message > > news:2c77619d-c382-41ab-8f7e-f6a1e600303c(a)o15g2000vbb.googlegroups.com... > On 18 mayo, 17:45, "Androcles" <Headmas...(a)Hogwarts.physics_z> wrote: > > > <va...(a)icmf.inf.cu> wrote in message > > >news:a0b2912c-81ea-4a90-9be5-ac82a7224142(a)f14g2000vbn.googlegroups.com.... > > > Einstein is right saying that x, y, z are the three independent of > > time. > > You are totally wrong saying that x, y and z are INFEPENDENT OF TIME, > > because the coordinate x is DEPENDENT of the time t. > > > ================================================== > > Bwahahahahahahahaha! > > Too funny! > > Libertad para los 5 x' s, los dejó vaga ! > > You seem now totally unable > ======================================== > usted duende loco comunista ignorante del idiota. For a fixed point in the moving frame k, the corresponding point in the stationary frame K will have an x = const + vt and is dependent upon time t, whereas x' = x - vt = const isn't. |