Now, the next BIG contest is ON!
in [Digital Cameras]
|
Prev: Here Comes the 3-D Camera: Revolutionary Prototype Films Worldin Three Dimensions
Next: Why the Nikon Coolscan V ED is so expensive event on vintage market ?
From: RichA on 13 May 2010 17:55 On May 13, 2:55 pm, DanP <dan.pe...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > On 12 May, 21:48, RichA <rander3...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > WHO will be the company to release...a COMPACT FF camera??! > > What is the point? It would only make sense if they make the lenses > small as well and that affect IQ. > > DanP Slower lenses don't need to be the size of buses. Someone is going to do it. Likely something about the size of a Pentax K7, at some point. If Olympus had any sense, they'd do it and break the 4/3 straight jacket that confines them.
From: Bruce on 13 May 2010 18:09 On Thu, 13 May 2010 15:50:11 -0500, BFD <bfd(a)zipnullnada.org> wrote: > >I do understand the need for control of DOF. The identical DOF effects can >be obtained from a smaller sensor by just changing the focal-length used. Nonsense. Changing the angle of view would completely ruin the shot. You really are a fool - you have not the faintest idea what you are talking about.
From: John McWilliams on 13 May 2010 18:38 Bruce wrote: > On Thu, 13 May 2010 15:50:11 -0500, BFD <bfd(a)zipnullnada.org> wrote: >> I do understand the need for control of DOF. The identical DOF effects can >> be obtained from a smaller sensor by just changing the focal-length used. > > > Nonsense. Changing the angle of view would completely ruin the shot. > You really are a fool - you have not the faintest idea what you are > talking about. But he does talk a lot to make up for it. And it's so reassuring to know that he will: > try to never cripple myself by stubbornly holding onto the past out of > habit or learned ignorance. Superb! -- John McWilliams
From: Robert Spanjaard on 13 May 2010 18:47 On Thu, 13 May 2010 23:09:16 +0100, Bruce wrote: >>I do understand the need for control of DOF. The identical DOF effects >>can be obtained from a smaller sensor by just changing the focal-length >>used. > > > Nonsense. Changing the angle of view would completely ruin the shot. > You really are a fool - you have not the faintest idea what you are > talking about. It's the P&S troll. What did you expect? -- Regards, Robert http://www.arumes.com
From: Wilba on 13 May 2010 20:05
Bruce wrote: > Some AF systems are even worse; Canon's being a > case in point, with fundamental errors built in to the system. Where can I find out more about this? |