Prev: How to make sure that the process does not encounter the PAGE FAULT after the thread running
Next: [PATCH 1/1] regulator: return set_mode is same mode is requested
From: Earl Chew on 17 May 2010 10:40 I'm looking for some advice to focus my investigation. I'm using 2.6.31 kernel on PowerPC with glibc version 2.7. I've been looking into some anomalous behaviour with a program that uses clone(2). I've narrowed down the problem to interaction between the program and the following null clone: int nullClone(void*) { return 0; } .... pid_t childPid = clone(nullClone, stackPointer, CLONE_VM | SIGCHLD, 0, 0, 0, 0); waitpid(childPid, &childStatus); As you can see, the null clone is essentially a nop. Commenting /* CLONE_VM | */, leaving only SIGCHLD (aka null fork(2)) makes the following problem to go away. The problem I see is that subsequent to the clone(2): pthread_mutex_lock(parentMutex); ... pthread_mutex_unlock(parentMutex); /* Null clone here */ pthread_mutex_lock(parentMutex); ... pthread_mutex_unlock(parentMutex); <---- Gets stuck here. The mutex in question is created with PTHREAD_PRIO_INHERIT. There are a few more details regarding null threads which I won't get into just yet. I need to try to distill the problem into a smaller program. I'm suspicious because I believe the null clone should not have any effect on the caller -- but obviously does, and in a way I don't understand. Do you have suggestions as to where I should look next to explain this anomalous behaviour ? What effects might the null clone have on the mutex implementation that I am not accounting for ? Earl -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ |