Prev: Subtraction of 2 numbers/cells
Next: Counting Cells in a column depending on another column but excluding duplicates
From: מיכאל (מיקי) אבידן on 11 Apr 2010 08:47 A few weeks ago I have read, in this DG, an answer regarding this issue. I hardly remember the answer but it had to do with "Wrapping" and if the number of characters typed are between X and Y the result will be #######. I will appreciate if anyone can provide a direct link to that thread [I'm sure that who responded, to that question, will be able to locate it for me]. Thanks in advance, Micky
From: Niek Otten on 11 Apr 2010 09:50 Hi Micky, Although it is a lot less ago than a gew weeks, you may mean this one: http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.excel.misc/browse_thread/thread/1a66143d29428cf0/84b4437d23a68efd?q=number+characters+in+cell+group:*Excel*#84b4437d23a68efd Mind the line breaks in the URL Or check directly microsoft.public.excel.misc, Apr 8, 6:27 PM -- Kind regards, Niek Otten Microsoft MVP - Excel "מיכאל (מיקי) אבידן" <micky-a*at*tapuz.co.il> wrote in message news:480D89EF-78D9-4E22-81DE-782618778234(a)microsoft.com... >A few weeks ago I have read, in this DG, an answer regarding this issue. > I hardly remember the answer but it had to do with "Wrapping" and if the > number of characters typed are between X and Y the result will be #######. > I will appreciate if anyone can provide a direct link to that thread [I'm > sure that who responded, to that question, will be able to locate it for > me]. > Thanks in advance, > Micky
From: Dave Peterson on 11 Apr 2010 09:55 This question has been posted lots of times and responded to even more! If you see ###'s in a cell that's formatted as text and the length of the string is between 255 and 1024, you'll have this trouble. Change the format to General and the problem goes away. It's not a problem with wrapping the text. It's a problem with the text format and the length of the string. But there can be a problem seeing more than about 1000 characters in a cell -- with or without wrapping. One way around the problem is to insert alt-enters (to force new lines within the cell) every 80-100 characters. You may have to manually adjust the rowheight to see much more of the text. ????? (????) ????? wrote: > > A few weeks ago I have read, in this DG, an answer regarding this issue. > I hardly remember the answer but it had to do with "Wrapping" and if the > number of characters typed are between X and Y the result will be #######. > I will appreciate if anyone can provide a direct link to that thread [I'm > sure that who responded, to that question, will be able to locate it for me]. > Thanks in advance, > Micky -- Dave Peterson
From: מיכאל (מיקי) אבידן on 11 Apr 2010 10:14 Thanks for responding. I don't know if microsoft.public.excel.misc is the same as "Discussions in Excel General Questions" but even of so - this is, unfortunately, not what I'm looking for. The 1'024 displayed versus 32,767 typed is very well known to me. The thread I'm looking for dealt with some sort of displaying ###### while no wrapping nor changing the cells size fixed the problem. Someone responded and said that the problem raises if the user types an amount of characters. [He mentioned 2 figures, which I don't remember. They could have been between 512 and 1024] I also don't remember if the problem had something to do with "Excel"s version [maybe "2007" or "2010"] Unfortunately, the Search feature - while after a string or posts of by supporter name - in al DG "su*ks It returns only one page with non-sorted posts etc... I still hope someone will remember/find this post or the one who responded will see my question. Micky "Niek Otten" wrote: > Hi Micky, > > Although it is a lot less ago than a gew weeks, you may mean this one: > > http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.excel.misc/browse_thread/thread/1a66143d29428cf0/84b4437d23a68efd?q=number+characters+in+cell+group:*Excel*#84b4437d23a68efd > > Mind the line breaks in the URL > > Or check directly microsoft.public.excel.misc, Apr 8, 6:27 PM > > -- > Kind regards, > > Niek Otten > Microsoft MVP - Excel > > "מיכאל (מיקי) אבידן" <micky-a*at*tapuz.co.il> wrote in message > news:480D89EF-78D9-4E22-81DE-782618778234(a)microsoft.com... > >A few weeks ago I have read, in this DG, an answer regarding this issue. > > I hardly remember the answer but it had to do with "Wrapping" and if the > > number of characters typed are between X and Y the result will be #######. > > I will appreciate if anyone can provide a direct link to that thread [I'm > > sure that who responded, to that question, will be able to locate it for > > me]. > > Thanks in advance, > > Micky >
From: מיכאל (מיקי) אבידן on 11 Apr 2010 11:26
Thank you. The 255-1024 was what I was looking for. BUT I still have one important question because of the IF [quote]: "If you see ###'s in a cell that's formatted as text and the length of the string is between 255 and 1024, you'll have this trouble". *** Is there any chance that upon typing 256 characters in a General formatted cell could lead to displaying all the 256(!) characters without the ###'s ? Micky "Dave Peterson" wrote: > This question has been posted lots of times and responded to even more! > > If you see ###'s in a cell that's formatted as text and the length of the string > is between 255 and 1024, you'll have this trouble. > > Change the format to General and the problem goes away. > > It's not a problem with wrapping the text. It's a problem with the text format > and the length of the string. > > But there can be a problem seeing more than about 1000 characters in a cell -- > with or without wrapping. > > One way around the problem is to insert alt-enters (to force new lines within > the cell) every 80-100 characters. You may have to manually adjust the > rowheight to see much more of the text. > > > > ????? (????) ????? wrote: > > > > A few weeks ago I have read, in this DG, an answer regarding this issue. > > I hardly remember the answer but it had to do with "Wrapping" and if the > > number of characters typed are between X and Y the result will be #######. > > I will appreciate if anyone can provide a direct link to that thread [I'm > > sure that who responded, to that question, will be able to locate it for me]. > > Thanks in advance, > > Micky > > -- > > Dave Peterson > . > |