From: SC Tom on

"C" <c(a)nospamers.com.invalid> wrote in message
news:hm8rgr$v16$1(a)speranza.aioe.org...
> SC Tom wrote:
>>
>>
>> "C" <c(a)nospamers.com.invalid> wrote in message
>> news:hm8l8e$fdu$1(a)speranza.aioe.org...
>>> SC Tom wrote:
>>>>
>>>> "C" <c(a)nospamers.com.invalid> wrote in message
>>>> news:hm8i7t$90o$1(a)speranza.aioe.org...
>>>>> JoJo wrote:
>>>>>> Hello:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am using Microsoft's Windows XP (SP3) platform and Outlook Express
>>>>>> 6
>>>>>> (OE6) is my main email application.
>>>>>> Recently I installed Internet Explorer 8 and so I am wondering if OE6
>>>>>> has a
>>>>>> corresponding upgrade to say OE7 or OE8.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * Can Outlook Express 6 (OE6) be upgraded to say Outlook Express
>>>>>> 7 or 8
>>>>>> ?
>>>>>> * If this upgrade is possible; I am interested in how to do it ?
>>>>>> * Can Microsoft Outlook client work as a stand alone application
>>>>>> or do I
>>>>>> need the Server also ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I like OE6 but I need to be able to add audio alarms (using message
>>>>>> rules)
>>>>>> when certain emails arrive. Thus the need to upgrade
>>>>>> from OE6 to something higher.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> JoJo.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> OE is history. No more updates. No new versions. I would suggest using
>>>>> Thunderbird as it is a FAR superior product to Outhouse Distress. It
>>>>> has an excellent junk filter, corrects your spelling as you type and
>>>>> has hundreds of add ons like a calendar and a to do function. Get it
>>>>> at http://www.mozilla.com/thunderbird.
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>>
>>>>> C
>>>>
>>>> You should try the newer version. You'll have even more fun!
>>>
>>> I don't do newer versions in Linux. When it comes down the repository
>>> pike, I'll upgrade. I've got it on my Windows boxes too and TB3 is
>>> pretty cool.
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> C
>>
>> You're right, it's not too bad. I prefer OE6 on XP and WLM on Win7
>> myself. I tried TB for a few weeks, but never could get the newsreader to
>> display like I wanted it to (or, probably more correctly, like I was used
>> to), so I dumped it and went back to WLM. I know there are separate
>> programs for each, but I kinda like the "all in one place" concept.
>
> I found the news reader in TB to be superior to OE. I have never tried WLM
> on any OS. What is it you wanted to do that OE could do and TB couldn't?
>
> --
>
> C

I could never get the sorting the way I wanted it without the settings
affecting my mail also. IIRC, any new replies showed up as separate from the
original, even though I didn't have it set up to break them apart. It's been
a while, but that was part of it, and other minor stuff that I chose not to
deal with. I was also trying to write some message rules and was having a
terrible time trying to find any real support for it. So I just went back to
what I knew. I used to thrive on aggravation and adversity when I was a
working stiff, but I don't need that in retirement :-)
--
SC Tom


From: Daave on
David H. Lipman wrote:
> From: "C" <c(a)nospamers.com.invalid>
>
>
>>> You're right, it's not too bad. I prefer OE6 on XP and WLM on Win7
>>> myself. I tried TB for a few weeks, but never could get the
>>> newsreader to display like I wanted it to (or, probably more
>>> correctly, like I was used to), so I dumped it and went back to
>>> WLM. I know there are separate programs for each, but I kinda like
>>> the "all in one place" concept.
>
>> I found the news reader in TB to be superior to OE. I have never
>> tried
>> WLM on any OS. What is it you wanted to do that OE could do and TB
>> couldn't?
>
> I have found that using Fidolook in conjunction with OE6 overcomes
> most of OE's short-comings.

Can Fidolook be used with WLM?


From: C on
SC Tom wrote:

> I could never get the sorting the way I wanted it without the settings
> affecting my mail also. IIRC, any new replies showed up as separate from
> the original, even though I didn't have it set up to break them apart.
> It's been a while, but that was part of it, and other minor stuff that I
> chose not to deal with. I was also trying to write some message rules
> and was having a terrible time trying to find any real support for it.
> So I just went back to what I knew. I used to thrive on aggravation and
> adversity when I was a working stiff, but I don't need that in
> retirement :-)

I just use View --> Threads --> Threads with Unread and it's solved. It
doesn't affect mail.

--

C
From: David H. Lipman on
From: "Daave" <daave(a)example.com>

| David H. Lipman wrote:
>> From: "C" <c(a)nospamers.com.invalid>


>>>> You're right, it's not too bad. I prefer OE6 on XP and WLM on Win7
>>>> myself. I tried TB for a few weeks, but never could get the
>>>> newsreader to display like I wanted it to (or, probably more
>>>> correctly, like I was used to), so I dumped it and went back to
>>>> WLM. I know there are separate programs for each, but I kinda like
>>>> the "all in one place" concept.

>>> I found the news reader in TB to be superior to OE. I have never
>>> tried
>>> WLM on any OS. What is it you wanted to do that OE could do and TB
>>> couldn't?

>> I have found that using Fidolook in conjunction with OE6 overcomes
>> most of OE's short-comings.

| Can Fidolook be used with WLM?


The Vista version...
http://www.fidolook.org/index.php?pagename=Main.Downloads

--
Dave
http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp


From: VanguardLH on
JoJo wrote:

> Hello:
>
> I am using Microsoft's Windows XP (SP3) platform and Outlook Express 6
> (OE6) is my main email application.
> Recently I installed Internet Explorer 8 and so I am wondering if OE6 has a
> corresponding upgrade to say OE7 or OE8.
>
> * Can Outlook Express 6 (OE6) be upgraded to say Outlook Express 7 or 8
> ?
> * If this upgrade is possible; I am interested in how to do it ?
> * Can Microsoft Outlook client work as a stand alone application or do I
> need the Server also ?
>
> I like OE6 but I need to be able to add audio alarms (using message rules)
> when certain emails arrive. Thus the need to upgrade
> from OE6 to something higher.
>
> Thanks,
> JoJo.

So in which newsgroup to which you shotgunned your same post are you
actually going to read the replies and respond there? Or are you really
going to separate post your reply to all those MULTI-posted newsgroups?