Prev: Euclidean geom = Elliptic unioned Hyperbolic same as Quantum Mechanics = particle union wave #4.32 & #247 Correcting Math & Atom Totality
Next: THE FACTOR OF 6 ERROR IN CURRENT MATHEMATICS, AS SHOWN BY CLEAR MATHEMATICS ("F" stay out)
From: Inverse 18 Mathematics on 30 Jul 2010 14:16
On 30 juil, 09:43, Inverse 19 mathematics <hope9...(a)verizon.net>
wrote:
>   Here is the stupidity, your mathematics and its Mathematician have
> been studying and refelecting on Prime number distribution and gaps ,
> by using a single line placement model, and coming to all kinds of
> bizarre conclusions. You are using the series as thus
>
> 5,7,11,13,17,19, 23,29,31,37
>
>  THE CORRECT way is that Prime numbers lay on two divergent series,
> thus
>
> -1,5,11,17,23,29,(35),41,47----
>
> +1,7,13,19,(25),31,37,43,(49)----
>
>  THE CLEAR PROOF Is using our simple half square method
>
>  A-Correct  mathematical method:
>
> 5^2/2=12.5-------7^2/2=24.5 gap is 12 ,24
>
> 11^2/2=60.5-----13^2/2=84.5 gap is 24 ,60
>
> 17^2/2=144.5----19^2/2=180.5 gap is 36 ,96
>
> 23^2/2=264.4----(25)62/2=312.5 gap is 48,132
>
>  The gaps are mathematically concordant at every12 and every
> 36(horizontal and vertical gaps)
>
> B Incorrect stupid method of current mathematics(using half squared
> method)
>
> 5^2/2=12.5 gap is 6
>
> 7^2/2=24.2 gap is 12
>
> 11^2/2=60.5 gap is 36
>
> 13^2/2=84.5gap is 24
>
> 17^2/2=144.5 gap is 60
>
> 19^2/2=180.5 gap is 36
>
> 23^2/2=264.5 gap is 84
>
> (25)^2/2=312.5 gap is 48
>
>  How incoordinate the gaps are in the series B and your mathematics
> have been reading these stupid gaps in series B and calling them "
> Murderess, Random , Impossible, and Of Riemanns  Great hypothesis the
> greatest Mystery of current Mathematics" etc--- The   fact is you
> stupid Mathematicians , and all you stupid Fermatists , you have
> created your own monsters by your stupid understanding of this
> mathematics and persists in finding bigger and bigger monster prime
> numbers, when we have placed them all corrrectly in billions and
> infinity ( -1 tangent program of Hope research , for which a challenge
> with your best sieve stands, to take place in Wisconsin).
>
>  What say! Your great Mathematics Professors including Dr Edgar
> Escultura and  Andrew Wiles, .  Donkeys like us may brey , but Asses
> are usually dumb, unless Wiles and Escultura want to say some thing
> wise about the above specific  series of prime number understanding,
> on behalf of your mathematics-- or let the dumb silence continue for
> another 300 years.
>
>  Hope Research

I totally agree with YBM comments. You have no rigor, no discipline,
no solid arguments. You may have found a way to determine prime
numbers. But pretending that you are the new flavor of the month and
that actual mathematics is garbage is childish and stupid.

You want to be treated seriously : start being serious! Crying that
actual mathematical theory is false won't help. Start from the
beginning, define clearly your mathematical objects, ask for help if
necessary. There are good books about number theory. Start reading
instead of posting insignificant stuff about prime numbers.

If you can't, then YOU should stay silent for at least the next 300
years!
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Euclidean geom = Elliptic unioned Hyperbolic same as Quantum Mechanics = particle union wave #4.32 & #247 Correcting Math & Atom Totality
Next: THE FACTOR OF 6 ERROR IN CURRENT MATHEMATICS, AS SHOWN BY CLEAR MATHEMATICS ("F" stay out)