From: Charles Hooper on 1 Nov 2006 12:00 Mathijs wrote: > Hi, > > I installed OracleExpress on a windows 2003 server. Right after the > installation, I was able to create and use a database. Then, after the > first reboot, the database didn't start automatically, but after > SQL> connect / > SQL> startup > things worked fine again. Now, after a third reboot, this trick doesn't > work anymore: > SQL> connect / > ERROR: > ORA-01034: ORACLE not available > ORA-27101: shared memory realm does not exist > > Q: How can I fix this? (there is already data in my database that I > really would like to use) And that Oracle behaves differently after the > second and the third reboot? > > Thanks in advance for your help. Below is the result of a few obvious > things that I checked before posting this message. > > M. > > > I've checked the ORACLE_SID in the environment and it is set to XE. > >set > ... > ORACLE_SID=XE > ... > > The listener is running: > >lsnrctl status XE > STATUS of the LISTENER > ------------------------ > Alias LISTENER > Version TNSLSNR for 32-bit W..: Ver.. 10.2.0.1.0 - Production > Start Date 01-NOV-2006 10:29:36 > Uptime 0 days 0 hr. 1 min. 22 sec > Trace Level off > Security ON: Local OS Authentication > SNMP OFF > Default Service XE > > and tnsping works: > >tnsping xe > ... > OK (30 msec) I compared your LSNRCTL STATUS SID output with that of my server. This is what my output looks like: Alias LISTENER Version TNSLSNR for 64-bit Windows: Version 10.2.0.2.0 - Production Start Date 28-OCT-2006 09:35:22 Uptime 4 days 3 hr. 4 min. 13 sec Trace Level off Security ON: Local OS Authentication SNMP OFF Listener Parameter File D:\oracle\product\10.2.0\db_1\network\admin\listener.ora Listener Log File D:\oracle\product\10.2.0\db_1\network\log\listener.log Listening Endpoints Summary... (DESCRIPTION=(ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=tcp)(HOST=myservername)(PORT=1521))) Services Summary... Service "DB1" has 1 instance(s). Instance "DB1", status UNKNOWN, has 1 handler(s) for this service... Service "DB1.world" has 1 instance(s). Instance "DB1", status READY, has 1 handler(s) for this service... Service "DB1_XPT.world" has 1 instance(s). Instance "DB1", status READY, has 1 handler(s) for this service... Service "DB2" has 1 instance(s). Instance "DB2", status UNKNOWN, has 1 handler(s) for this service... Service "DB2.world" has 1 instance(s). Instance "DB2", status READY, has 1 handler(s) for this service... Service "DB2_XPT.world" has 1 instance(s). The command completed successfully It looks like your system is set to automatically register databases, while I hand edited the listener.ora file to add the connections. Also, I noticed that your spfile specifies 20 sessions, while the alert log shows 49 on the last startup, but I am not sure if this has any impact. Charles Hooper PC Support Specialist K&M Machine-Fabricating, Inc.
From: HansF on 1 Nov 2006 13:03 On Wed, 01 Nov 2006 14:59:10 +0000, Mathijs wrote: > "Forum registration is possible only by downloading and installing Oracle > Database XE. After installation, click on the "Registration" link from > the Database homepage." > - http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/database/xe/forum.html > I am sorry to note that the search capability for OTN Discussion Forum does not seem to work for you. I have posted the solution to this umpteen times in Oracle's Database-General and Database-Installation forums. The link on your database home page is a courtesy copy only. Here it is again: 1) Register your request to access tyhe XE forum at http://www.oracle.com/technology/xe/registration 2) Sign in to the OTN Discussion groups with the same userid that you registered; 3) Access the discussion forum at http://forums.oracle.com/forums/forum.jspa?forumID=251 Notes: There is no need to wait for the registeration confirmation email. You must to log in to discussion forums every time you want to access XE forum -- Hans Forbrich (mailto: Fuzzy.GreyBeard_at_gmail.com) *** Feel free to correct me when I'm wrong! *** Top posting [replies] guarantees I won't respond.
From: Frank van Bortel on 1 Nov 2006 14:22 Charles Hooper schreef: > Frank van Bortel wrote: >> Mathijs schreef: >> >>> 01 nov 2006, (Charles Hooper): >>> >>>> Check the initialization file, check the alert log. >> I suspect this has something to do with it: >> >>> Mon Oct 30 11:35:58 2006 >>> Memory Notification: Library Cache Object loaded into SGA >>> Heap size 2208K exceeds notification threshold (2048K) >>> KGL object name :XDB.XDbD/PLZ01TcHgNAgAIIegtw== >> However, I would not know where to start resolving this... >> Someone else, perhaps? >> >> Any more messages after this line? > > I believe that "Heap size 2208K exceeds notification threshold (2048K)" > just indicates that a large object is being read into the SGA. Each > object loaded into the SGA requires a continuous range of memory. > Loading and unloading of large objects into the SGA can cause lot of > little available memory areas, that may be too small for a slightly > larger object to use, thus the instance may reach the SGA_MAX size > quicker than expected. This is just a polite warning that a large > (2.2MB) object is being loaded. > > I almost tripped over that warning too. > > Charles Hooper > PC Support Specialist > K&M Machine-Fabricating, Inc. > Hm - it has nothing to do with limits imposed on XE, then? -- Regards, Frank van Bortel Top-posting is one way to shut me up...
From: Charles Hooper on 1 Nov 2006 14:37 Frank van Bortel wrote: > Charles Hooper schreef: > > Frank van Bortel wrote: > >> Mathijs schreef: > >> > >>> 01 nov 2006, (Charles Hooper): > >>> > >>>> Check the initialization file, check the alert log. > >> I suspect this has something to do with it: > >> > >>> Mon Oct 30 11:35:58 2006 > >>> Memory Notification: Library Cache Object loaded into SGA > >>> Heap size 2208K exceeds notification threshold (2048K) > >>> KGL object name :XDB.XDbD/PLZ01TcHgNAgAIIegtw== > >> However, I would not know where to start resolving this... > >> Someone else, perhaps? > >> > >> Any more messages after this line? > > > > I believe that "Heap size 2208K exceeds notification threshold (2048K)" > > just indicates that a large object is being read into the SGA. Each > > object loaded into the SGA requires a continuous range of memory. > > Loading and unloading of large objects into the SGA can cause lot of > > little available memory areas, that may be too small for a slightly > > larger object to use, thus the instance may reach the SGA_MAX size > > quicker than expected. This is just a polite warning that a large > > (2.2MB) object is being loaded. > > > > I almost tripped over that warning too. > > > > Charles Hooper > > PC Support Specialist > > K&M Machine-Fabricating, Inc. > > > Hm - it has nothing to do with limits imposed on XE, then? > > -- > Regards, > Frank van Bortel > > Top-posting is one way to shut me up... Correction: "continuous" should read "contiguous" "cause lot of little available memory areas" should read "cause a large number of small non-contiguous memory areas" http://download-east.oracle.com/oowsf2005/003wp.pdf (bottom of page 10, top of page 11) This is a new feature of 10g R2. I have seen the same warning in 10.2.0.2 Standard Edition. There is a way to disable the warning, but I can't recall the method right now (might be _kgl_large_heap_warning_threshold). Charles Hooper PC Support Specialist K&M Machine-Fabricating, Inc.
From: Mathijs on 2 Nov 2006 03:21 01 nov 2006, (HansF): > 1) Register your request to access tyhe XE forum at > http://www.oracle.com/technology/xe/registration "Thank you for registering for the private Oracle Database XE Discussion Forum hosted by Tom Kyte. A confirmation email containing the Forum URL should arrive shortly." > 2) Sign in to the OTN Discussion groups with the same userid that you > registered; http://forums.oracle.com/forums/categoryHome.jspa?categoryID=84 (I'm logged in, top right says Welcome, Mathijs) > 3) Access the discussion forum at > http://forums.oracle.com/forums/forum.jspa?forumID=251 Error: you do not have permission to view the requested forum or category. Thanks for your help, Hans but it seems that Oracle doesn't like me at all :(
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 Prev: ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [17059] Next: APEX in Oracle XE stopped working |