From: Robert Comer on 3 Dec 2009 22:06 I just leave it as is and haven't had a problem. I'll do a little research on it now that you've piqued my interest in it again... -- Bob Comer Karl E. Peterson wrote: > Robert Comer wrote : >> I get that VPCbus thing too, never figured out why. > > Weird, huh? So just disable the sucker and move on? >
From: Karl E. Peterson on 7 Dec 2009 21:01 Robert Comer expressed precisely : > > He shoots; he scores! Damn, I don't believe I missed that. > > I usually get caught by that one too since they changed the default to NAT. > <g> > > > Well, with one little oddity. I can resolve the ip address for other > > machines on the network, it seems. All but one. The host. What's up > > with that? > > There is some weirdness between the host and guest, performance problems, and > that might be what's getting in the way. You might be able to just use the > IP Address, or put it in the lmhosts file. Any reason in particular for using lmhosts rather than hosts? -- [.NET: It's About Trust!]
From: Robert Comer on 7 Dec 2009 21:16 lmhosts works better for netbios. -- Bob Comer Karl E. Peterson wrote: > Robert Comer expressed precisely : >> > He shoots; he scores! Damn, I don't believe I missed that. >> >> I usually get caught by that one too since they changed the default to >> NAT. <g> >> >> > Well, with one little oddity. I can resolve the ip address for other >> > machines on the network, it seems. All but one. The host. What's up >> > with that? >> >> There is some weirdness between the host and guest, performance >> problems, and that might be what's getting in the way. You might be >> able to just use the IP Address, or put it in the lmhosts file. > > Any reason in particular for using lmhosts rather than hosts? >
From: Karl E. Peterson on 7 Dec 2009 21:38
Robert Comer was thinking very hard : >> Any reason in particular for using lmhosts rather than hosts? > > lmhosts works better for netbios. Huh. I'll have to play with that. Thanks... -- [.NET: It's About Trust!] |