From: Stephen on 7 May 2010 19:24 I though I had made a cool discovery in my piles of old junk. I found a boxed set of "Microsoft Office 4.2 for the Macintosh", with manuals a pile of 3.5 inch floppies. Guess what? All floppies are there except disk 1!!!! Arrrgh! What a shame, I though for sure someone would like to have that! Oh! Well! Back to more rummaging!
From: James Jolley on 7 May 2010 20:15 On 2010-05-08 00:24:14 +0100, Stephen <srmoll(a)gmail.com> said: > I though I had made a cool discovery in my piles of old junk. > > I found a boxed set of "Microsoft Office 4.2 for the Macintosh", with > manuals a pile of 3.5 inch floppies. Guess what? All floppies are > there except disk 1!!!! Arrrgh! What a shame, I though for sure > someone would like to have that! > > Oh! Well! > > Back to more rummaging! That's just sods law in action. Perhaps it's a blessing that disk 1 isn't there, knowing how things turn out, it was probably corrupted anyway.
From: Ian McCall on 8 May 2010 02:44 On 2010-05-08 00:24:14 +0100, Stephen <srmoll(a)gmail.com> said: > I though I had made a cool discovery in my piles of old junk. > > I found a boxed set of "Microsoft Office 4.2 for the Macintosh", with > manuals a pile of 3.5 inch floppies. Still my favourite version. 5.0 had a few useful extras, but felt bloated on my LC. 4.2 ran nicely and did pretty much everything I wanted - I only missed envelope printing. Cheers, Ian
From: Woody on 8 May 2010 06:46 Ian McCall <ian(a)eruvia.org> wrote: > On 2010-05-08 00:24:14 +0100, Stephen <srmoll(a)gmail.com> said: > > > I though I had made a cool discovery in my piles of old junk. > > > > I found a boxed set of "Microsoft Office 4.2 for the Macintosh", with > > manuals a pile of 3.5 inch floppies. > > Still my favourite version. 5.0 had a few useful extras, but felt > bloated on my LC. 4.2 ran nicely and did pretty much everything I > wanted - I only missed envelope printing. I think the pinacle of it was 5.1, as that had little wiggly red underlines under spelling mistakes. That was the last inovation in office. -- Woody www.alienrat.com
From: Peter Ceresole on 8 May 2010 07:14 Woody <usenet(a)alienrat.co.uk> wrote: > I think the pinacle of it was 5.1, as that had little wiggly red > underlines under spelling mistakes. That was the last inovation in > office. Yes, I agree. Nowadays, for the effective useability of Word 5.1, I'd go for TextEdit or, if wanting more bells and whistles, Pages, which I have anyway because Anne needs Keynote to prepare ppds for her slide lectures. But I held on to Word 5.1 for years. The only thing that was actually much better was WordPerfect 3.5. Wonderful. I happily paid for that and used it for years. But Corel fucked up the Windows version, which was unbelievably awful, so it died. -- Peter
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 Prev: How to capture this video? Next: iPhone game recommendation - 'Angry Birds' |