Prev: Second Clay Mathematics Award claimed, but how should it be split?
Next: Proof of Cook's Theorem in Unary
From: Rupert on 21 Oct 2009 19:32
I found this paper very interesting:

http://philmat.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/14/2/153

In particular, I found the discussion in Section 5.1 very interesting.
But I am interested in the philosophical significance of all of this.
What reason do we have, exactly, to think that all the Omega-
consequences of ZFC are true?
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Second Clay Mathematics Award claimed, but how should it be split?
Next: Proof of Cook's Theorem in Unary