From: Ulisse on 6 Feb 2006 16:29 >If you want an alternative, maybe try kerio 4.2.3, it's not as touchy >and it's easier to use out of the box, yet you can configure rules and >so on if you desire too. Thanks for your news. In your opinion is it nìbetter Kerio or Zone Alarm firewall? Click on the link please and give me you advice. >http://www.snapfiles.com/Freeware/security/fwfirewall.html Thanks again
From: Volker Birk on 6 Feb 2006 16:29 Ulisse <ulixis(a)nospamemail.it> wrote: > >If you want an alternative, maybe try kerio 4.2.3, it's not as touchy > >and it's easier to use out of the box, yet you can configure rules and > >so on if you desire too. > Thanks for your news. In your opinion is it n?better Kerio or Zone > Alarm firewall? Click on the link please and give me you advice. > >http://www.snapfiles.com/Freeware/security/fwfirewall.html None of them can do more than the Windows-Firewall, but both are bloaty. Yours, VB. -- > was ist wenn $BACKUPSERVER und $PRODUKTIVSERVER in einem Geb?ude, Stockwerk > oder Serverraum stehen und die L?schanlage (Fehlfunktion oder Brandfall) > die komplette IT zerst?rt Murphy meets Darwin. (Timm Thiemann zu Thomas Wildgruber in d.a.s.r)
From: Kerodo on 6 Feb 2006 19:45 In article <mpffu152b095aea1ht5j5urrchb5e680fc(a)4ax.com>, ulixis(a)NOSPAMemail.it says... > >If you want an alternative, maybe try kerio 4.2.3, it's not as touchy > >and it's easier to use out of the box, yet you can configure rules and > >so on if you desire too. > > Thanks for your news. In your opinion is it nìbetter Kerio or Zone > Alarm firewall? Click on the link please and give me you advice. > >http://www.snapfiles.com/Freeware/security/fwfirewall.html > > Thanks again > Well, they're all pretty bloated these days as Volker says. I can't really tell you what's best. That's for you to try and decide. I suggest trying some of them and picking one. -- Kerodo
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 Prev: Netscreen 5XP Firmware... Next: Reason 412: The remote peer is no longer responding |