From: Ulisse on
>If you want an alternative, maybe try kerio 4.2.3, it's not as touchy
>and it's easier to use out of the box, yet you can configure rules and
>so on if you desire too.

Thanks for your news. In your opinion is it nìbetter Kerio or Zone
Alarm firewall? Click on the link please and give me you advice.
>http://www.snapfiles.com/Freeware/security/fwfirewall.html

Thanks again
From: Volker Birk on
Ulisse <ulixis(a)nospamemail.it> wrote:
> >If you want an alternative, maybe try kerio 4.2.3, it's not as touchy
> >and it's easier to use out of the box, yet you can configure rules and
> >so on if you desire too.
> Thanks for your news. In your opinion is it n?better Kerio or Zone
> Alarm firewall? Click on the link please and give me you advice.
> >http://www.snapfiles.com/Freeware/security/fwfirewall.html

None of them can do more than the Windows-Firewall, but both are bloaty.

Yours,
VB.
--
> was ist wenn $BACKUPSERVER und $PRODUKTIVSERVER in einem Geb?ude, Stockwerk
> oder Serverraum stehen und die L?schanlage (Fehlfunktion oder Brandfall)
> die komplette IT zerst?rt
Murphy meets Darwin. (Timm Thiemann zu Thomas Wildgruber in d.a.s.r)
From: Kerodo on
In article <mpffu152b095aea1ht5j5urrchb5e680fc(a)4ax.com>,
ulixis(a)NOSPAMemail.it says...
> >If you want an alternative, maybe try kerio 4.2.3, it's not as touchy
> >and it's easier to use out of the box, yet you can configure rules and
> >so on if you desire too.
>
> Thanks for your news. In your opinion is it nìbetter Kerio or Zone
> Alarm firewall? Click on the link please and give me you advice.
> >http://www.snapfiles.com/Freeware/security/fwfirewall.html
>
> Thanks again
>

Well, they're all pretty bloated these days as Volker says. I can't
really tell you what's best. That's for you to try and decide. I
suggest trying some of them and picking one.

--
Kerodo