Open Item: pg_controldata - machine readable?
in [PgSql]
|
Prev: [HACKERS] libpq should not be using SSL_CTX_set_client_cert_cb
Next: Open Item: invalid declspec for PG_MODULE_MAGIC
From: Tom Lane on 25 May 2010 23:03 Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki.takahiro(a)oss.ntt.co.jp> writes: > There is an open item "pg_controldata - machine readable?" in the list: > http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.0_Open_Items > The proposal by Joe Conway is adding a new contib module. > http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4B959D7A.6010907(a)joeconway.com > http://github.com/jconway/pg_controldata > Should we add the module to 9.0? No. This is a new feature that wasn't even under consideration, let alone written, at the time of 9.0 feature freeze. It does not get into either core or contrib this time around. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
From: Joe Conway on 25 May 2010 23:11 On 05/25/2010 08:03 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki.takahiro(a)oss.ntt.co.jp> writes: >> There is an open item "pg_controldata - machine readable?" in the list: >> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.0_Open_Items > >> The proposal by Joe Conway is adding a new contib module. >> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4B959D7A.6010907(a)joeconway.com >> http://github.com/jconway/pg_controldata > >> Should we add the module to 9.0? > > No. This is a new feature that wasn't even under consideration, > let alone written, at the time of 9.0 feature freeze. It does not > get into either core or contrib this time around. Yup, agreed. That was why I put it on github instead of sending a patch to the list. It was also a quick and dirty hack -- maybe it could be cleaned up for 9.1, but I'm not sure there was consensus that it was really needed. Joe
From: Takahiro Itagaki on 25 May 2010 23:32 Joe Conway <mail(a)joeconway.com> wrote: > >> There is an open item "pg_controldata - machine readable?" in the list: > >> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.0_Open_Items > >> Should we add the module to 9.0? > > > > No. This is a new feature that wasn't even under consideration, > > let alone written, at the time of 9.0 feature freeze. It does not > > get into either core or contrib this time around. > > Yup, agreed. That was why I put it on github instead of sending a patch > to the list. It was also a quick and dirty hack -- maybe it could be > cleaned up for 9.1, but I'm not sure there was consensus that it was > really needed. OK, I moved it from 9.0 open items to new features for 9.1. Regards, --- Takahiro Itagaki NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
From: Greg Smith on 1 Jun 2010 01:06
Takahiro Itagaki wrote: > The proposal by Joe Conway is adding a new contib module. > http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4B959D7A.6010907(a)joeconway.com > http://github.com/jconway/pg_controldata > There's a second one of these floating around now too: http://labs.omniti.com/trac/pgtreats/browser/trunk/contrib/control -- Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US Baltimore, MD PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support greg(a)2ndQuadrant.com www.2ndQuadrant.us -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers |