From: 98 on
Wendell wrote recently in microsoft.public.win98.apps:

> After updating msimg32.dll on Windows 98 SE, Opera 10.54 appears
> to install and run without any problems. Without updating the DLL,
> Opera will still run, but gives an error message about the
> transparency feature.

I always find it interesting when someone without much of a posting
history posts to a dormant windows 98 newsgroup. I wonder what
motivated them to do it. How exactly did they choose which group to
post to. Why didn't they do a little more investigation to see what
might be the best group to post to.

So because this looks like some-what useful information, I'm adding a
couple of much more active groups to the original distribution so that
more people will see it.

> On the same system, Opera 10.60 will not run. So maybe v10.54 is
> the last to run on Win98.
>
> The msimg32.dll v5.00.1693.1 that comes with Win98 needs to be
> replaced with v5.00.2218.1 that comes with Windows ME. For
> details, see this thread:
>
> http://www.bleepingcomputer.com/forums/topic153757.html

I don't use opera myself, as Firefox 2.0.0.20 works just fine as a
web-browser for win-98, and netscape communicator 4.79 is a perfectly
good usenet client.
From: thanatoid on
"98(a)Guy" <98(a)Guy.com> wrote in
news:4C326D3D.FA0CB11F(a)Guy.com:

> Wendell wrote recently in microsoft.public.win98.apps:
>
>> After updating msimg32.dll on Windows 98 SE, Opera 10.54
>> appears to install and run without any problems. Without
>> updating the DLL, Opera will still run, but gives an error
>> message about the transparency feature.
>
> I always find it interesting when someone without much of a
> posting history posts to a dormant windows 98 newsgroup. I
> wonder what motivated them to do it. How exactly did they
> choose which group to post to. Why didn't they do a little
> more investigation to see what might be the best group to
> post to.
>
> So because this looks like some-what useful information,
> I'm adding a couple of much more active groups to the
> original distribution so that more people will see it.

What would the world do without your sage advice and protection?

>> On the same system, Opera 10.60 will not run. So maybe
>> v10.54 is the last to run on Win98.
>>
>> The msimg32.dll v5.00.1693.1 that comes with Win98 needs
>> to be replaced with v5.00.2218.1 that comes with Windows
>> ME. For details, see this thread:
>>
>> http://www.bleepingcomputer.com/forums/topic153757.html

Changing the DLL did NOTHING on my USB(a)10 install. IIRC, it
actually fucked it up. It's probably just another way MS have
thought up of introducing spyware into computers whose owners
don't like IE.

> I don't use opera myself, as Firefox 2.0.0.20 works just
> fine as a web-browser for win-98, and netscape communicator
> 4.79 is a perfectly good usenet client.

Not to mention you are too stupid to use Opera. Firefox - IE for
people who like to proudly say they "don't use IE".



--
Mozart tells us what it's like to be human, Beethoven tells us
what it's like to be Beethoven and Bach tells us what it's like
to be the universe.
- origin unknown
From: Hot-Text on
Old news 98(a)Guy
we @ Opera 10.60 on windows 98 SE
it was up dated 2 days a go!


From: 98 Guy on
thanatoid wrote:

> What would the world do without your sage advice and protection?

The same thing it would do without your crass comments and foul outlook.

> > I don't use opera myself, as Firefox 2.0.0.20 works just
> > fine as a web-browser for win-98, and netscape communicator
> > 4.79 is a perfectly good usenet client.
>
> Not to mention you are too stupid to use Opera.

So that makes you just stupid enough to use it I suppose.

> Firefox - IE for people who like to proudly say they "don't use IE".

No.

Firefox - a browser that actually works better than IE 6 has for the
past 5 years.