Prev: Otptofets
Next: Rebranded transistors?
From: Tim Williams on 17 Feb 2010 20:43
"Jon Slaughter" <Jon_Slaughter(a)Hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:hlhuu0$483$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
> Obviously the opto's bjt's may not be the same spec as discrete, etc but
> all the info should be in the datasheets.

You wish. ;-)

Although if you're lucky, you might find a plot of CTR vs. Rbe. Not sure
I've ever see t_r / t_f vs. Rbe.

Tim

--
Deep Friar: a very philosophical monk.
Website: http://webpages.charter.net/dawill/tmoranwms


From: Jon Slaughter on 17 Feb 2010 21:02
Tim Williams wrote:
> "Jon Slaughter" <Jon_Slaughter(a)Hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:hlhuu0$483$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>> Obviously the opto's bjt's may not be the same spec as discrete, etc
>> but all the info should be in the datasheets.
>
> You wish. ;-)
>
> Although if you're lucky, you might find a plot of CTR vs. Rbe. Not
> sure I've ever see t_r / t_f vs. Rbe.
>

Hence the "should" ;)


From: JosephKK on 19 Feb 2010 00:51
On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 20:02:14 -0600, "Jon Slaughter" <Jon_Slaughter(a)Hotmail.com> wrote:

>Tim Williams wrote:
>> "Jon Slaughter" <Jon_Slaughter(a)Hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:hlhuu0$483$1(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>>> Obviously the opto's bjt's may not be the same spec as discrete, etc
>>> but all the info should be in the datasheets.
>>
>> You wish. ;-)
>>
>> Although if you're lucky, you might find a plot of CTR vs. Rbe. Not
>> sure I've ever see t_r / t_f vs. Rbe.
>>
>
>Hence the "should" ;)
>
Still a false assumption. The very assumption that is reasonable to
fully characterize every possibly useful parameter over many
production runs is so beyond cost acceptable. They are in business
to make a profit, not to do and publish the results research that
will their competitors more than it could possibly profit their
customers.
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Otptofets
Next: Rebranded transistors?