From: Jon on
In article <hv0vt4$82l$1(a)news.eternal-september.org>, gfourwwk(a)tesco.net
says...
> I would guess as soon as possible they'll move all customers over
> to one 3g network so they can sell off the other.

You would be wise not to place a bet on that theory!
--
Regards
Jon
From: JL on
On 13 June, 20:58, Jon <s...(a)jonparker.plus.com> wrote:
> In article <hv0vt4$82...(a)news.eternal-september.org>, gfour...(a)tesco.net
> says...
>
> > I would guess as soon as possible they'll move all customers over
> > to one 3g network so they can sell off the other.
>
> You would be wise not to place a bet on that theory!
> --
> Regards
> Jon

Selling one off would not deliver improved coverage at all really. I
was hoping they'd combine the brands as well as physical networks -
seems odd to be acting as competitors.
From: Woody on
"JL" <newsaccount(a)mail2web.com> wrote in message
news:ce5119a2-3985-493c-b15f-03f588ca168a(a)w31g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
> On 13 June, 20:58, Jon <s...(a)jonparker.plus.com> wrote:
>> In article <hv0vt4$82...(a)news.eternal-september.org>,
>> gfour...(a)tesco.net
>> says...
>>
>> > I would guess as soon as possible they'll move all customers
>> > over
>> > to one 3g network so they can sell off the other.
>>
>> You would be wise not to place a bet on that theory!
>> --
>> Regards
>> Jon
>
> Selling one off would not deliver improved coverage at all
> really. I
> was hoping they'd combine the brands as well as physical
> networks -
> seems odd to be acting as competitors.



But what will happen to MBNL - the joint operation between H3G
and T-Mob to share some 3G resources?


--
Woody

harrogate three at ntlworld dot com


From: J B on
"Jon" <spam(a)jonparker.plus.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.267f487cd93622df9896b4(a)news.eternal-september.org...

> It's currently being trialled amongst some head office staff and seems
> to be going well. I'm not privvy to the details and even if I were I
> would not post them here, but there are some minor technical hitches to
> get around before it gets rolled out. Shouldn't be too long though,
> hopefully.

Is there a 'real time' meaning to 'not too long'? :-)


--
J B

From: Jon on
In article <87kundFqf4U1(a)mid.individual.net>, jb(a)invalid.com says...
> "Jon" <spam(a)jonparker.plus.com> wrote in message
> news:MPG.267f487cd93622df9896b4(a)news.eternal-september.org...
>
> > It's currently being trialled amongst some head office staff and seems
> > to be going well. I'm not privvy to the details and even if I were I
> > would not post them here, but there are some minor technical hitches to
> > get around before it gets rolled out. Shouldn't be too long though,
> > hopefully.
>
> Is there a 'real time' meaning to 'not too long'? :-)

Not that I can share in public, but I would be disspointed if it was not
done by the end of the summer.
--
Regards
Jon