Origin of life elsewhere and close together
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Crackpot conspiracy theory believed by millions violates laws of physics
Next: THE WORTHLESSNESS OF GOLD DUE TO TO HUGE SUBSEA DEPOSITS OF THAT COMMODITY. One only deposit is estimated to overshot the 40 millions tons
From: Cwatters on 10 Jun 2010 17:08 "BURT" <macromitch(a)yahoo.com> wrote in message news:6a499c63-4e55-4294-b06f-f3e43f7575fb(a)42g2000prb.googlegroups.com... > Of people that are on extraterestrial planets? I believe that they are > close to us. I believe that in the order of the universe God put life > close together in space. Otherwise there would be planets that would > never make contact. Now that to me does not make sense. Na he knew they'd only fight so he put them out of contact in seperate universes.
From: Glenn on 10 Jun 2010 19:37 On Jun 10, 12:22�pm, Michael Young <youngms...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jun 10, 3:04�pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > Then don't wait, no one is stopping you. My point here is that it's > > > pointless to speculate. We'll be long gone before it happens. Probably > > > as a species, but who knows? > > > Please prove your point. I am dealing in fact. > > What fact? Facts about what? > > > How is space travel pointless speculation? > > For two reasons. 1) The global climate change is a far more pressing > concern than space travel; we don't have the time or resources to > worry about sending manned missions out to colonize Mars. 2) It's > pointless speculation because, with the exception of the moon or Mars, > you and I will be long dead before we ever manage to get anyone > outside the solar system to colonize other systems. That much is most > certainly a fact. You're as goofy as he is.
From: BURT on 10 Jun 2010 20:09 On Jun 10, 4:37�pm, Glenn <GlennShel...(a)msn.com> wrote: > On Jun 10, 12:22 pm, Michael Young <youngms...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jun 10, 3:04 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > Then don't wait, no one is stopping you. My point here is that it's > > > > pointless to speculate. We'll be long gone before it happens. Probably > > > > as a species, but who knows? > > > > Please prove your point. I am dealing in fact. > > > What fact? Facts about what? > > > > How is space travel pointless speculation? > > > For two reasons. 1) The global climate change is a far more pressing > > concern than space travel; we don't have the time or resources to > > worry about sending manned missions out to colonize Mars. 2) It's > > pointless speculation because, with the exception of the moon or Mars, > > you and I will be long dead before we ever manage to get anyone > > outside the solar system to colonize other systems. That much is most > > certainly a fact. > > You're as goofy as he is.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - Science isn't going to win the argument against religion about God. Stephen Hawking is the goofy one. He says that when they make contact with us it will be so that they can colonize us. The Earth will never even try such a dumb thing let alone an advanced civilization. How are we going to save humanity in space when all are resources could only put a few people into space? Stephen Hawking has said some pretty stupid things and he is supposed to be the smartest. Obviously he is not the most intelligent. Mitch Raemsch
From: Glenn on 10 Jun 2010 20:34 On Jun 10, 5:09�pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > On Jun 10, 4:37 pm, Glenn <GlennShel...(a)msn.com> wrote: > > > > > On Jun 10, 12:22 pm, Michael Young <youngms...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Jun 10, 3:04 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > Then don't wait, no one is stopping you. My point here is that it's > > > > > pointless to speculate. We'll be long gone before it happens. Probably > > > > > as a species, but who knows? > > > > > Please prove your point. I am dealing in fact. > > > > What fact? Facts about what? > > > > > How is space travel pointless speculation? > > > > For two reasons. 1) The global climate change is a far more pressing > > > concern than space travel; we don't have the time or resources to > > > worry about sending manned missions out to colonize Mars. 2) It's > > > pointless speculation because, with the exception of the moon or Mars, > > > you and I will be long dead before we ever manage to get anyone > > > outside the solar system to colonize other systems. That much is most > > > certainly a fact. > > > You're as goofy as he is.- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text - > > Science isn't going to win the argument against religion about God. > > Stephen Hawking is the goofy one. He says that when they make contact > with us it will be so that they can colonize us. The Earth will never > even try such a dumb thing let alone an advanced civilization. How are > we going to save humanity in space when all are resources could only > put a few people into space? Stephen Hawking has said some pretty > stupid things and he is supposed to be the smartest. Obviously he is > not the most intelligent. > Apparently you haven't seen the move "Avatar". Steven has seen it 67 times.
From: Desertphile on 11 Jun 2010 11:01
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 16:37:51 -0700 (PDT), Glenn <GlennSheldon(a)msn.com> wrote: > On Jun 10, 12:22�pm, Michael Young <youngms...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > On Jun 10, 3:04�pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > > Then don't wait, no one is stopping you. My point here is that it's > > > > pointless to speculate. We'll be long gone before it happens. Probably > > > > as a species, but who knows? > > > > > Please prove your point. I am dealing in fact. > > > > What fact? Facts about what? > > > > > How is space travel pointless speculation? > > > > For two reasons. 1) The global climate change is a far more pressing > > concern than space travel; we don't have the time or resources to > > worry about sending manned missions out to colonize Mars. 2) It's > > pointless speculation because, with the exception of the moon or Mars, > > you and I will be long dead before we ever manage to get anyone > > outside the solar system to colonize other systems. That much is most > > certainly a fact. > You're as goofy as he is. Translation: you couldn't refute or even deny what he wrote, so you restorted to the only thing left to you---- an attempt to insult. -- http://desertphile.org Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water "Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz |