Prev: [HACKERS] leaky views, yet again
Next: [HACKERS] inner join removal
From: Tom Lane on 8 Jul 2010 12:09
Joshua Tolley <eggyknap(a)gmail.com> writes:
> I noticed the following out-of-date bits in a comment in xlogutils.c:

Removing the comment altogether doesn't seem appropriate. I changed it
to

* (Getting the buffer lock is not really necessary during single-process
* crash recovery, but some subroutines such as MarkBufferDirty will complain
* if we don't have the lock. In hot standby mode it's definitely necessary.)

regards, tom lane

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: [HACKERS] leaky views, yet again
Next: [HACKERS] inner join removal