Outlook 2003, Windows Mobile 6, and Multiple calendars
in [Pocket PC]
|
From: Beverly Howard on 11 Nov 2009 11:52 >> you gave advice without checking to make sure your advice was actually valid in the first place << I submit that while your complaint would be valid if you were paying for the advice, or the responder was being paid to give advice (mvp's are not paid) but, imho, in this case, the appropriate response would have been to simply ignore the response or to make a correction... it was not posted in order to irritate you as was the obvious purpose of your response. Respectfully, but sincerely, Beverly Howard
From: Brian Tillman [MVP - Outlook] on 11 Nov 2009 14:50 "RandomEvents" <ross.phillip.m(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:223e72d4-9262-4087-a6ab-db51babb9ba5(a)p8g2000yqb.googlegroups.com... > The issue is that you gave advice without checking to make sure your > advice was actually valid in the first place. Ah. i see your error now. I didn't give advice, I asked a question. Actually, i asked three. Try reading. -- Brian Tillman [MVP-Outlook]
From: RandomEvents on 11 Nov 2009 19:58 On Nov 11, 2:50 pm, "Brian Tillman [MVP - Outlook]" <tillman1...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > "RandomEvents" <ross.philli...(a)gmail.com> wrote in message > > news:223e72d4-9262-4087-a6ab-db51babb9ba5(a)p8g2000yqb.googlegroups.com... > > > The issue is that you gave advice without checking to make sure your > > advice was actually valid in the first place. > > Ah. i see your error now. I didn't give advice, I asked a question. > Actually, i asked three. Try reading. > -- > Brian Tillman [MVP-Outlook] Brian, Heh, you got me, punctuation does make all the difference doesn't it? I was wrong in my response, as I read your questions as statements. Cheers, Phil
From: RandomEvents on 11 Nov 2009 20:13 On Nov 11, 11:52 am, Beverly Howard <B...(a)NoSpamBevHoward.com> wrote: > >> you gave advice without checking to make sure your advice was > actually valid in the first place << > > I submit that while your complaint would be valid if you were paying for > the advice, or the responder was being paid to give advice (mvp's are > not paid) but, imho, in this case, the appropriate response would have > been to simply ignore the response or to make a correction... it was not > posted in order to irritate you as was the obvious purpose of your response. > > Respectfully, but sincerely, > Beverly Howard Beverly, My compliant would have been valid if, I had read his questions for what they were, questions. That just kinda of makes me look like an idiot. As for wanting advice or technical help to be useful whether one pays for it or not, I think that's a goal that everyone should strive for. It's the ignoring of the MVP's with empty advice that kills threads and litters the internet with those threads of half answered questions (I was looking for a network printer driver work around before tackling this issue, hence the frustration). All that being said, it seems simplest to mimic what Chapura did for XP and Activesync, and write a program the replaces the calendar export \import in Windows Mobile Device Center (I just don't know how robust the API is for that compared to Activesync). Cheers, -Phil
From: Mark on 17 Nov 2009 17:21
RandomEvents <ross.phillip.m(a)gmail.com> wrote in news:938257ab-1c63-4ea8-a696-bb016c84cadd(a)j35g2000vbl.googlegroups.com: > On Oct 25, 5:52�pm, Mark <pho...(a)bogus.com> wrote: >> "Nathan Sokalski" <njsokal...(a)hotmail.com> wrote in >> news:etA34C4TKHA.3392 @TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl: >> >> > I use ActiveSync to synchronize my Outlook 2003 and Windows Mobile >> > 6 calendars. This works fine for my main calendar (labelled My >> > Calendar i > n >> > Outlook 2003), but the other calendars in Outlook 2003 (such as >> > Birthda > y >> > Calendar) do not get synchronized. Is there a way to tell Outlook >> > 2003, ActiveSync, and/or Windows Mobile 6 (whichever ones are >> > necessary) whic > h >> > calendars to synchronize? Thanks. > > Mark, > I used this option before I upgraded to Windows 7 & Outlook 2007. Do > you know of an option for this setup? > > Phil Phil Only just checked back. I can't comment on Win7 and Outlook 2007 as I'm still working happily with XP and Outlook 2003. Pocket Mirror V2.2.4 installs with ActiveSync 4.5 and Win Mobile 6.5 so I don't see why it wouldnt be able to pull data from Ouitlook 2007. Why not give it a try? Mark |