From: William R. Walsh on
Hi!

> The thread discusses oxidisation of contact pads in current Seagate
> and Western Digital hard drives.

I've seen minor occurrences of it and wondered what it was, but only on the
"one use" contact pads on the bottom of the drive's PCB. (My guess is that
these are used to set the drive up for its first time use and do some basic
tests to assure the new drive is functional.)

Some drives had more of this apparent oxidation than others, but all of the
ones I've seen had it from the moment they were removed from the package. It
hasn't gotten any worse and these drives continue to operate properly. I
checked a few at random and did not find a similar effect on the contacts
going to the spindle motor or headstack.

William


From: Franc Zabkar on
On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 14:03:39 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whit3rd(a)gmail.com>
put finger to keyboard and composed:

>On Apr 8, 12:11�am, Franc Zabkar <fzab...(a)iinternode.on.net> wrote:

>> Is this the fallout from RoHS?
>
>Maybe not. There are other known culprits, like the drywall (gypsum
>board,
>sheetrock... whatever it's called in your region) that outgasses
>hydrogen
>sulphide. Some US construction of a few years ago is so bad with
>this
>toxic and corrosive gas emission that demolition of nearly-new
>construction
>is called for.
>
>Corrosion of nearby copper is one of the symptoms of the nasty
>product.

It's not just Russia that has this problem. The same issue comes up
frequently at the HDD Guru forums.

- Franc Zabkar
--
Please remove one 'i' from my address when replying by email.
From: Sergey Kubushyn on
In sci.electronics.repair Franc Zabkar <fzabkar(a)iinternode.on.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 14:03:39 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whit3rd(a)gmail.com>
> put finger to keyboard and composed:
>
>>On Apr 8, 12:11�am, Franc Zabkar <fzab...(a)iinternode.on.net> wrote:
>
>>> Is this the fallout from RoHS?
>>
>>Maybe not. There are other known culprits, like the drywall (gypsum
>>board,
>>sheetrock... whatever it's called in your region) that outgasses
>>hydrogen
>>sulphide. Some US construction of a few years ago is so bad with
>>this
>>toxic and corrosive gas emission that demolition of nearly-new
>>construction
>>is called for.
>>
>>Corrosion of nearby copper is one of the symptoms of the nasty
>>product.
>
> It's not just Russia that has this problem. The same issue comes up
> frequently at the HDD Guru forums.

I'm right here in the US and I had 3 of 3 WD 1TB drives failed at the same
time in RAID1 thus making the entire array dead. It is not that you can
simply buff that dark stuff off and you're good to go. Drive itself tries to
recover from failures by rewriting service info (remapping etc.) but
connection is unreliable and it trashes the entire disk beyound repair. Then
you have that infamous "click of death"... BTW, it is not just WD; others
are also that bad.

They had good old gold plated male/female headers on older drives and those
were reliable. Newer drives had, sorry for an expression, "gold plated" pads
and springy contacts from the drive heads. That would have them something
like $0.001 saving per drive wrt those headers and they took that road. Gold
plating was also of a cheapest variety possible, probably immersion so it
wouldn't last long. Newest drives from Seagate also have that construction
but pads look like tin plated, no gold. Don't know how long it would last.

What we are looking at is an example of a brilliant design with a touch of
genius--it DOES last long enough so they work past their warranty period and
at the same time it will NOT last enough to make it work very long past the
manucturer's warranty. I don't know if it is just greed/incompetence or a
deliberate design feature but if it is the latter my kudos to their
engineers for job well done :(

---
******************************************************************
* KSI(a)home KOI8 Net < > The impossible we do immediately. *
* Las Vegas NV, USA < > Miracles require 24-hour notice. *
******************************************************************
From: Arno on
In comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage Sergey Kubushyn <ksi(a)koi8.net> wrote:
> In sci.electronics.repair Franc Zabkar <fzabkar(a)iinternode.on.net> wrote:
>> On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 14:03:39 -0700 (PDT), whit3rd <whit3rd(a)gmail.com>
>> put finger to keyboard and composed:
>>
>>>On Apr 8, 12:11?am, Franc Zabkar <fzab...(a)iinternode.on.net> wrote:
>>
>>>> Is this the fallout from RoHS?
>>>
>>>Maybe not. There are other known culprits, like the drywall (gypsum
>>>board,
>>>sheetrock... whatever it's called in your region) that outgasses
>>>hydrogen
>>>sulphide. Some US construction of a few years ago is so bad with
>>>this
>>>toxic and corrosive gas emission that demolition of nearly-new
>>>construction
>>>is called for.
>>>
>>>Corrosion of nearby copper is one of the symptoms of the nasty
>>>product.
>>
>> It's not just Russia that has this problem. The same issue comes up
>> frequently at the HDD Guru forums.

> I'm right here in the US and I had 3 of 3 WD 1TB drives failed at the same
> time in RAID1 thus making the entire array dead. It is not that you can
> simply buff that dark stuff off and you're good to go. Drive itself tries to
> recover from failures by rewriting service info (remapping etc.) but
> connection is unreliable and it trashes the entire disk beyound repair. Then
> you have that infamous "click of death"... BTW, it is not just WD; others
> are also that bad.

It is extremly unlikely for a slow chemical process to achive this
level of syncronicity. About as unlikely that it would be fair to call
it impossible

Your array died from a different cause that would affect all drives
simultaneously, such as a power spike.

> They had good old gold plated male/female headers on older drives and those
> were reliable. Newer drives had, sorry for an expression, "gold plated" pads
> and springy contacts from the drive heads. That would have them something
> like $0.001 saving per drive wrt those headers and they took that road. Gold
> plating was also of a cheapest variety possible, probably immersion so it
> wouldn't last long. Newest drives from Seagate also have that construction
> but pads look like tin plated, no gold. Don't know how long it would last.

Tin lasts pretty long, unless you unplug/replug connectors. That is its
primary weakness.

> What we are looking at is an example of a brilliant design with a touch of
> genius--it DOES last long enough so they work past their warranty period and
> at the same time it will NOT last enough to make it work very long past the
> manucturer's warranty. I don't know if it is just greed/incompetence or a
> deliberate design feature but if it is the latter my kudos to their
> engineers for job well done :(

I think you are on the wrong trail here. Contact mechanics and
chemistry is well understood and has been studied longer than modern
electronics. So has metal plating technology in general.

Arno

> ---
> ******************************************************************
> * KSI(a)home KOI8 Net < > The impossible we do immediately. *
> * Las Vegas NV, USA < > Miracles require 24-hour notice. *
> ******************************************************************

--
Arno Wagner, Dr. sc. techn., Dipl. Inform., CISSP -- Email: arno(a)wagner.name
GnuPG: ID: 1E25338F FP: 0C30 5782 9D93 F785 E79C 0296 797F 6B50 1E25 338F
----
Cuddly UI's are the manifestation of wishful thinking. -- Dylan Evans
From: Arno on
In comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.storage Jeff Liebermann <jeffl(a)cruzio.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 17:11:39 +1000, Franc Zabkar
> <fzabkar(a)iinternode.on.net> wrote:
[...]

> I've NEVER had a
> drive failure that was directly attributed to such contact corrosion.
> It's usually something else that kills the drive.

I think people are jumping to conclusion, because the discolorarion
is what they can see (and think they understand). There is a posting
in this thread with a person that has had a 3-way RAID1 fail and
attributes it to the contact discoloration. Now, whith a slow chemical
process, the required level of synchronicity is as unlikely that
calling it impossible is fair.

>>The thread has
>>several detailed photos. All except the older tinned PCB appear to
>>show evidence of serious corrosion.
>>
>>Is this the fallout from RoHS? Surely it's not the result of some cost
>>saving measure?

> Nope. If the contacts were tin-silver, 5% lead, or one of the other
> low lead alloys, the corrosion would probably be white or light gray
> in color. The dark black suggests there's at least some lead involved
> or possibly dissimilar contact material.

Actually pure silver also sulfidizes (?) in this way. The
look is very characteristic. I think this is silver plating
we see. It is typically not a problem on contacts that
are in use, it does not crawl between contact points.

I suspect in the observed instances, this is a purely
aestetic problem and has no impact on HDD performance
or reliability whatsoever.

Arno

--
Arno Wagner, Dr. sc. techn., Dipl. Inform., CISSP -- Email: arno(a)wagner.name
GnuPG: ID: 1E25338F FP: 0C30 5782 9D93 F785 E79C 0296 797F 6B50 1E25 338F
----
Cuddly UI's are the manifestation of wishful thinking. -- Dylan Evans