Prev: group of formal differences vs. Grothendieck group
Next: Is ZF + CH + not-CC consistent?
From: zzbunker on 16 Nov 2009 16:38
On Nov 16, 3:38 pm, spudnik <Space...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> didn't Einstein and a buddy invent acoustical cooling?...  like,
> he wasn't such a dummy, after all!

Einstein is credited with no much idiocy regarding engineering
by the relativity stooges, it really matters little.
Since the people who actually understand post photon engineering
work on Post Bohr Atoms and Atomic clock watches.
Post Newton probabilty, Flat Screen Software Debuggers Desktop
Publishing, CD, DVD,
and Data Fusion.
Post IBM Spin, USB, Distributed Processing Software, mp3, mpeg,
Flash Memory, and
All-in-One Printers.
Post Goedel Numbering, The 21st Century, Biue Ray, and Digital
Books.
Post Dirac Vectoring, GPS, XML, Cyber Batteries, Rapid Prototyping,
on Post GM-nomics.





>
> > > Microwave cooling?
>
> >   Well, nobody excpets idiots that don't understand
> >   anything other than Dark Matter to understand science.
>
> thus:
> did you check that on a symbolic processor?...  neat.
>
> > (2a)^2 + (2b)^2 + (2c)^2 + (2d)^2 =
> > (a+b-c-d)^2 + (a+b-c-d)^2 + (a-b)^2 + (c-d)^2 + (a-b)^2 + (c-d)^2 ,
>
> thus:
> the English useage of "maths," emphasizing the plurality
> of "mathematics" or *mathematica* -- not MathematicaTM
> of the Wolframites -- is the four subjects of the quadrivium;
> the trivium, you've obviously acquired in spite of school.
>     check-out Fermat's reconstruction of Euclid's porisms,
> as a model of proving theorems in (planar) geometry e.g..
>
> thus:
> apparently the only factor that effects the decay
> of a given atomic state (a-hem) is that of proximity
> to other decaying states, as in critical mass;
> sort of a bosonic aspect of fermions?
>     sure wish, someone'd bury that stinky cat of Schroedinger
> ('s joke .-)
>
> > > > I've got some radium that behaves very oddly.")
> > > >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell%27s_theorem#Importance_of_the_theorem
> > > The idea of a hidden variable is a grammatical consequence of any
> > > quantum theory, as I argued.
>
> thus:
> saw the latest rendition of Rubik's Hexahedron at a store;
> it is just a vari-colored light in the center of each face,
> which apparently uses an acceleraometer to orient itself
> (with respect to thee .-)
>
> thus:
> nice, constructive analysis;
> wouldn't an approach via the Fermat point
> of a trigon, be useful?
> (L'Ouvre:http://wlym.com.-)
>
> > In terms of convex hulls we are finding the largest line segment contained
> > in it and then finding the midpoint of the line segment perpendicular to the
> > largest line segment that runs through the largest line segment's midpoint.
>
> --Cap'n Trade & Warren Buffet, together again?
> Rep. Waxman's God-am bill, doesn't institute a tarrif, instead !?!

First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: group of formal differences vs. Grothendieck group
Next: Is ZF + CH + not-CC consistent?