Prev: [PATCH 39/39] union-mount: Implement union-aware lsetxattr()
Next: [PATCH 25/39] fallthru: tmpfs fallthru support
From: Valerie Aurora on 8 Aug 2010 12:00 While we can check if a file system is currently read-only, we can't guarantee that it will stay read-only. The file system can be remounted read-write at any time; it's also conceivable that a file system can be mounted a second time and converted to read-write if the underlying fs allows it. This is a problem for union mounts, which require the underlying file system be read-only. Add a read-only users count and don't allow remounts to change the file system to read-write or read-write mounts if there are any read-only users. Signed-off-by: Valerie Aurora <vaurora(a)redhat.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro(a)zeniv.linux.org.uk> --- fs/namespace.c | 13 +++++++++++++ fs/super.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/fs.h | 8 ++++++++ 3 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/namespace.c b/fs/namespace.c index b8a66db..984c331 100644 --- a/fs/namespace.c +++ b/fs/namespace.c @@ -200,6 +200,19 @@ int __mnt_is_readonly(struct vfsmount *mnt) } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__mnt_is_readonly); +static void inc_hard_readonly_users(struct vfsmount *mnt) +{ + BUG_ON(!__mnt_is_readonly(mnt)); + mnt->mnt_sb->s_hard_readonly_users++; +} + +static void dec_hard_readonly_users(struct vfsmount *mnt) +{ + BUG_ON(!__mnt_is_readonly(mnt)); + BUG_ON(mnt->mnt_sb->s_hard_readonly_users == 0); + mnt->mnt_sb->s_hard_readonly_users--; +} + static inline void inc_mnt_writers(struct vfsmount *mnt) { #ifdef CONFIG_SMP diff --git a/fs/super.c b/fs/super.c index 938119a..86bdf1f 100644 --- a/fs/super.c +++ b/fs/super.c @@ -108,6 +108,7 @@ out: */ static inline void destroy_super(struct super_block *s) { + BUG_ON(s->s_hard_readonly_users); security_sb_free(s); kfree(s->s_subtype); kfree(s->s_options); @@ -512,6 +513,21 @@ rescan: return NULL; } +/* + * Some uses of file systems require that they never be mounted + * read-write anywhere (e.g., the lower layers of union mounts must + * always be read-only). If there are any of these "hard" read-only + * mounts, don't permit a transition to read-write. + * + * Must be called while holding the namespace lock. + */ + +int sb_is_hard_readonly(struct super_block *sb) +{ + return sb->s_hard_readonly_users ? 1 : 0; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(sb_is_hard_readonly); + /** * do_remount_sb - asks filesystem to change mount options. * @sb: superblock in question @@ -550,6 +566,9 @@ int do_remount_sb(struct super_block *sb, int flags, void *data, int force) return -EBUSY; } + if (!(flags & MS_RDONLY) && sb_is_hard_readonly(sb)) + return -EROFS; + if (sb->s_op->remount_fs) { retval = sb->s_op->remount_fs(sb, &flags, data); if (retval) @@ -924,6 +943,10 @@ vfs_kern_mount(struct file_system_type *type, int flags, const char *name, void WARN((mnt->mnt_sb->s_maxbytes < 0), "%s set sb->s_maxbytes to " "negative value (%lld)\n", type->name, mnt->mnt_sb->s_maxbytes); + error = -EROFS; + if (!(flags & MS_RDONLY) && sb_is_hard_readonly(mnt->mnt_sb)) + goto out_sb; + mnt->mnt_mountpoint = mnt->mnt_root; mnt->mnt_parent = mnt; up_write(&mnt->mnt_sb->s_umount); diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h index 68ca1b0..eeb49d7 100644 --- a/include/linux/fs.h +++ b/include/linux/fs.h @@ -1382,6 +1382,13 @@ struct super_block { * generic_show_options() */ char *s_options; + + /* + * Some mounts require that the underlying file system never + * transition to read-write. They mark the sb itself as + * read-only. + */ + int s_hard_readonly_users; }; extern struct timespec current_fs_time(struct super_block *sb); @@ -1768,6 +1775,7 @@ extern int get_sb_nodev(struct file_system_type *fs_type, int (*fill_super)(struct super_block *, void *, int), struct vfsmount *mnt); void generic_shutdown_super(struct super_block *sb); +int sb_is_hard_readonly(struct super_block *sb); void kill_block_super(struct super_block *sb); void kill_anon_super(struct super_block *sb); void kill_litter_super(struct super_block *sb); -- 1.6.3.3 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ |