Prev: [PATCH 02/13] writeback: avoid unnecessary calculation of bdi dirty thresholds
Next: [PATCH 00/13] writeback patches for 2.6.36
From: Wu Fengguang on 5 Aug 2010 12:40
This is to prepare for moving the dirty expire policy to move_expired_inodes().
No behavior change.

Acked-by: Jan Kara <jack(a)suse.cz>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mel(a)csn.ul.ie>
Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu(a)intel.com>
---
fs/fs-writeback.c | 16 ++++++++--------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

--- linux-next.orig/fs/fs-writeback.c 2010-08-05 23:28:18.000000000 +0800
+++ linux-next/fs/fs-writeback.c 2010-08-05 23:28:19.000000000 +0800
@@ -213,8 +213,8 @@ static bool inode_dirtied_after(struct i
* Move expired dirty inodes from @delaying_queue to @dispatch_queue.
*/
static void move_expired_inodes(struct list_head *delaying_queue,
- struct list_head *dispatch_queue,
- unsigned long *older_than_this)
+ struct list_head *dispatch_queue,
+ struct writeback_control *wbc)
{
LIST_HEAD(tmp);
struct list_head *pos, *node;
@@ -224,8 +224,8 @@ static void move_expired_inodes(struct l

while (!list_empty(delaying_queue)) {
inode = list_entry(delaying_queue->prev, struct inode, i_list);
- if (older_than_this &&
- inode_dirtied_after(inode, *older_than_this))
+ if (wbc->older_than_this &&
+ inode_dirtied_after(inode, *wbc->older_than_this))
break;
if (sb && sb != inode->i_sb)
do_sb_sort = 1;
@@ -262,10 +262,10 @@ static void move_expired_inodes(struct l
* |
* +--> dequeue for IO
*/
-static void queue_io(struct bdi_writeback *wb, unsigned long *older_than_this)
+static void queue_io(struct bdi_writeback *wb, struct writeback_control *wbc)
{
list_splice_init(&wb->b_more_io, &wb->b_io);
- move_expired_inodes(&wb->b_dirty, &wb->b_io, older_than_this);
+ move_expired_inodes(&wb->b_dirty, &wb->b_io, wbc);
}

static int write_inode(struct inode *inode, struct writeback_control *wbc)
@@ -528,7 +528,7 @@ void writeback_inodes_wb(struct bdi_writ
wbc->wb_start = jiffies; /* livelock avoidance */
spin_lock(&inode_lock);
if (!wbc->for_kupdate || list_empty(&wb->b_io))
- queue_io(wb, wbc->older_than_this);
+ queue_io(wb, wbc);

while (!list_empty(&wb->b_io)) {
struct inode *inode = list_entry(wb->b_io.prev,
@@ -557,7 +557,7 @@ static void __writeback_inodes_sb(struct
wbc->wb_start = jiffies; /* livelock avoidance */
spin_lock(&inode_lock);
if (!wbc->for_kupdate || list_empty(&wb->b_io))
- queue_io(wb, wbc->older_than_this);
+ queue_io(wb, wbc);
writeback_sb_inodes(sb, wb, wbc, true);
spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
}


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: [PATCH 02/13] writeback: avoid unnecessary calculation of bdi dirty thresholds
Next: [PATCH 00/13] writeback patches for 2.6.36