From: Alessandro Zummo on 10 Aug 2010 09:40 On Mon, 9 Aug 2010 09:17:29 -0700 wellsk40(a)gmail.com wrote: > + > + retval = request_irq(rtc->irq, lpc32xx_rtc_alarm_interrupt, > + IRQF_DISABLED, "rtcalarm", rtc); > + if (retval < 0) { > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Can't request interrupt\n"); > + goto err_free_irq; > + } if the driver can work without the alarm irq you can convert this to a non fatal warning. having an rtc without alarms is much better than having none. -- Best regards, Alessandro Zummo, Tower Technologies - Torino, Italy http://www.towertech.it -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|
Pages: 1 Prev: BUG: scheduling while atomic: swapper/0/0x10000002 Next: Question on siig sata 3 controller |