From: Alan Cox on 5 May 2010 06:50 The port mutex protects port->tty, but these paths never need to walk from port->tty. They do need the low level lock as the API expects that but they already also take it. Thus we can drop the extra mutex lock calls here. Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan(a)linux.intel.com> --- drivers/serial/serial_core.c | 5 +---- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/serial/serial_core.c b/drivers/serial/serial_core.c index 2379045..0603e0d 100644 --- a/drivers/serial/serial_core.c +++ b/drivers/serial/serial_core.c @@ -1506,12 +1506,10 @@ static int uart_carrier_raised(struct tty_port *port) struct uart_state *state = container_of(port, struct uart_state, port); struct uart_port *uport = state->uart_port; int mctrl; - mutex_lock(&port->mutex); spin_lock_irq(&uport->lock); uport->ops->enable_ms(uport); mctrl = uport->ops->get_mctrl(uport); spin_unlock_irq(&uport->lock); - mutex_unlock(&port->mutex); if (mctrl & TIOCM_CAR) return 1; return 0; @@ -1521,12 +1519,11 @@ static void uart_dtr_rts(struct tty_port *port, int onoff) { struct uart_state *state = container_of(port, struct uart_state, port); struct uart_port *uport = state->uart_port; - mutex_lock(&port->mutex); + if (onoff) uart_set_mctrl(uport, TIOCM_DTR | TIOCM_RTS); else uart_clear_mctrl(uport, TIOCM_DTR | TIOCM_RTS); - mutex_unlock(&port->mutex); } /* -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|
Pages: 1 Prev: [PATCH 14/20] vc: Locking clean up Next: [PATCH 03/20] riscom8: kill use of lock_kernel |