From: Steven Whitehouse on 17 Feb 2010 05:00 We don't need to look up the lockspace in this particular case since we already have a pointer to it (which was being dereferenced in order to do the lookup in the first place). Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho(a)redhat.com> --- fs/dlm/lockspace.c | 6 +----- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/dlm/lockspace.c b/fs/dlm/lockspace.c index 26a8bd4..ce0fdf5 100644 --- a/fs/dlm/lockspace.c +++ b/fs/dlm/lockspace.c @@ -37,10 +37,6 @@ static ssize_t dlm_control_store(struct dlm_ls *ls, const char *buf, size_t len) ssize_t ret = len; int n = simple_strtol(buf, NULL, 0); - ls = dlm_find_lockspace_local(ls->ls_local_handle); - if (!ls) - return -EINVAL; - switch (n) { case 0: dlm_ls_stop(ls); @@ -51,7 +47,7 @@ static ssize_t dlm_control_store(struct dlm_ls *ls, const char *buf, size_t len) default: ret = -EINVAL; } - dlm_put_lockspace(ls); + return ret; } -- 1.6.2.5 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|
Pages: 1 Prev: [PATCH] nouveau: fix undefined reference to acpi_lid_open Next: [dlm] Two small sysfs patches |