From: Sam Ravnborg on
If a minimal config did not specify the value
of all choice values, the resulting configuration
could have wrong values.

Consider following example:
config M
def_bool y
option modules
choice
prompt "choice list"
config A
tristate "a"
config B
tristate "b"
endchoice

With a defconfig like this:
CONFIG_M=y
CONFIG_A=y

The resulting configuration would have

CONFIG_A=m

which was unexpected.

The problem was not not all choice values were set and thus
kconfig calculated a wrong value.

The fix is to set all choice values when we
read a defconfig files.

conf_set_all_new_symbols() is refactored such that
random choice values are now handled by a dedicated function.
And new choice values are set by set_all_choice_values().

This was not the minimal fix, but the fix that resulted
in the most readable code.

Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam(a)ravnborg.org>
Reported-by: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve(a)android.com>
Tested-by: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve(a)android.com>
---
scripts/kconfig/confdata.c | 102 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)

diff --git a/scripts/kconfig/confdata.c b/scripts/kconfig/confdata.c
index e5d66e4..ac13f0f 100644
--- a/scripts/kconfig/confdata.c
+++ b/scripts/kconfig/confdata.c
@@ -918,13 +918,73 @@ void conf_set_changed_callback(void (*fn)(void))
conf_changed_callback = fn;
}

+static void randomize_choice_values(struct symbol *csym)
+{
+ struct property *prop;
+ struct symbol *sym;
+ struct expr *e;
+ int cnt, def;

-void conf_set_all_new_symbols(enum conf_def_mode mode)
+ /*
+ * If choice is mod then we may have more items slected
+ * and if no then no-one.
+ * In both cases stop.
+ */
+ if (csym->curr.tri != yes)
+ return;
+
+ prop = sym_get_choice_prop(csym);
+
+ /* count entries in choice block */
+ cnt = 0;
+ expr_list_for_each_sym(prop->expr, e, sym)
+ cnt++;
+
+ /*
+ * find a random value and set it to yes,
+ * set the rest to no so we have only one set
+ */
+ def = (rand() % cnt);
+
+ cnt = 0;
+ expr_list_for_each_sym(prop->expr, e, sym) {
+ if (def == cnt++) {
+ sym->def[S_DEF_USER].tri = yes;
+ csym->def[S_DEF_USER].val = sym;
+ }
+ else {
+ sym->def[S_DEF_USER].tri = no;
+ }
+ }
+ csym->flags |= SYMBOL_DEF_USER;
+ /* clear VALID to get value calculated */
+ csym->flags &= ~(SYMBOL_VALID);
+}
+
+static void set_all_choice_values(struct symbol *csym)
{
- struct symbol *sym, *csym;
struct property *prop;
+ struct symbol *sym;
struct expr *e;
- int i, cnt, def;
+
+ prop = sym_get_choice_prop(csym);
+
+ /*
+ * Set all non-assinged choice values to no
+ */
+ expr_list_for_each_sym(prop->expr, e, sym) {
+ if (!sym_has_value(sym))
+ sym->def[S_DEF_USER].tri = no;
+ }
+ csym->flags |= SYMBOL_DEF_USER;
+ /* clear VALID to get value calculated */
+ csym->flags &= ~(SYMBOL_VALID);
+}
+
+void conf_set_all_new_symbols(enum conf_def_mode mode)
+{
+ struct symbol *sym, *csym;
+ int i, cnt;

for_all_symbols(i, sym) {
if (sym_has_value(sym))
@@ -960,8 +1020,6 @@ void conf_set_all_new_symbols(enum conf_def_mode mode)

sym_clear_all_valid();

- if (mode != def_random)
- return;
/*
* We have different type of choice blocks.
* If curr.tri equal to mod then we can select several
@@ -976,35 +1034,9 @@ void conf_set_all_new_symbols(enum conf_def_mode mode)
continue;

sym_calc_value(csym);
-
- if (csym->curr.tri != yes)
- continue;
-
- prop = sym_get_choice_prop(csym);
-
- /* count entries in choice block */
- cnt = 0;
- expr_list_for_each_sym(prop->expr, e, sym)
- cnt++;
-
- /*
- * find a random value and set it to yes,
- * set the rest to no so we have only one set
- */
- def = (rand() % cnt);
-
- cnt = 0;
- expr_list_for_each_sym(prop->expr, e, sym) {
- if (def == cnt++) {
- sym->def[S_DEF_USER].tri = yes;
- csym->def[S_DEF_USER].val = sym;
- }
- else {
- sym->def[S_DEF_USER].tri = no;
- }
- }
- csym->flags |= SYMBOL_DEF_USER;
- /* clear VALID to get value calculated */
- csym->flags &= ~(SYMBOL_VALID);
+ if (mode == def_random)
+ randomize_choice_values(csym);
+ else
+ set_all_choice_values(csym);
}
}
--
1.6.0.6

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/