Prev: [HACKERS] [PATCH 1/4] Add "COPY ... TO FUNCTION ..." support
Next: Backup history file should be replicated in Streaming Replication?
From: Robert Haas on 30 Dec 2009 00:58
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 12:56 AM, Daniel Farina <drfarina(a)acm.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 9:46 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> Sure.  If you think you can make it work using bytea, that seems
>> clearly better than using an internal type, all things being equal.
>
> I think both are perfectly viable and can be supported simultaneously,
> actually...I simply like INTERNAL because the mechanism and passed
> data structure for when you *do* want to write a C function is just
> really crisp and simple, and is not going to be a source of overhead.

OK. I think we'll have to see the proposed patch before we can really
make a final judgement on this, but hopefully I've at least given you
enough feedback/food for thought to move this forward in a meaningful
way...

....Robert

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Prev: [HACKERS] [PATCH 1/4] Add "COPY ... TO FUNCTION ..." support
Next: Backup history file should be replicated in Streaming Replication?