[PATCH 5/9] oom: cleanup has_intersects_mems_allowed()
in [Kernel]
|
Prev: + oom-improve-commentary-in-dump_tasks.patch added to -mm tree
Next: + oom-pf_exiting-check-should-take-mm-into-account.patch added to -mm tree
From: KOSAKI Motohiro on 16 Jun 2010 22:00 Now has_intersects_mems_allowed() has own thread iterate logic, but it should use while_each_thread(). It slightly improve the code readability. Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim(a)gmail.com> Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro(a)jp.fujitsu.com> --- mm/oom_kill.c | 8 ++++---- 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c index 541a59b..b27db90 100644 --- a/mm/oom_kill.c +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c @@ -46,10 +46,10 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(zone_scan_lock); * shares the same mempolicy nodes as current if it is bound by such a policy * and whether or not it has the same set of allowed cpuset nodes. */ -static bool has_intersects_mems_allowed(struct task_struct *tsk, +static bool has_intersects_mems_allowed(struct task_struct *p, const nodemask_t *mask) { - struct task_struct *start = tsk; + struct task_struct *tsk = p; do { if (mask) { @@ -69,8 +69,8 @@ static bool has_intersects_mems_allowed(struct task_struct *tsk, if (cpuset_mems_allowed_intersects(current, tsk)) return true; } - tsk = next_thread(tsk); - } while (tsk != start); + } while_each_thread(p, tsk); + return false; } #else -- 1.6.5.2 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ |