Prev: linux-next: manual merge of the devicetree tree with the net tree
Next: [PATCH] Staging: winbond: Fix C99 Comment issues in mac_structures.h
From: Mathieu Rondonneau on 19 May 2010 01:40
Does it make sense to prevent looking for stolen RAM below the ISA section.


Signed-off-by: Mathieu Rondonneau <mathieu.rondonneau(a)gmail.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/e820.c | 2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
index 7bca3c6..322c9c3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
@@ -1156,6 +1156,8 @@ void __init e820_reserve_resources_late(void)
end = MAX_RESOURCE_SIZE;
if (start >= end)
continue;
+ if (end < ISA_START_ADDRESS)
+ continue;
printk(KERN_DEBUG "reserve RAM buffer: %016llx - %016llx ",
start, end);
reserve_region_with_split(&iomem_resource, start, end,
--
1.6.3.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: linux-next: manual merge of the devicetree tree with the net tree
Next: [PATCH] Staging: winbond: Fix C99 Comment issues in mac_structures.h