Prev: Somebody take a look please! (some kind of kernel bug?)
Next: net: remove trailing spaces in messages
From: Divyesh Shah on 24 Mar 2010 17:00 even if they are found to be co-operating. The prio_trees do not have any IDLE cfqqs on them. cfq_close_cooperator() is called from cfq_select_queue() and cfq_completed_request(). The latter ensures that the close cooperator code does not get invoked if the current cfqq is of class IDLE but the former doesn't seem to have any such checks. So an IDLE cfqq may get merged with a BE cfqq from the same group which should be avoided. Signed-off-by: Divyesh Shah<dpshah(a)google.com> --- block/cfq-iosched.c | 2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/block/cfq-iosched.c b/block/cfq-iosched.c index dee9d93..e6910dc 100644 --- a/block/cfq-iosched.c +++ b/block/cfq-iosched.c @@ -1721,6 +1721,8 @@ static struct cfq_queue *cfq_close_cooperator(struct cfq_data *cfqd, { struct cfq_queue *cfqq; + if (cfq_class_idle(cur_cfqq)) + return NULL; if (!cfq_cfqq_sync(cur_cfqq)) return NULL; if (CFQQ_SEEKY(cur_cfqq)) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ |