From: Manfred Spraul on 30 Jun 2010 15:40 Hi Andrew, On 06/29/2010 09:08 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 10:42:42 -0500 (CDT) > Christoph Lameter<cl(a)linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > >> This is a patch from Manfred. Required to make 2.6.35-rc3 work. >> >> > My current version of the patch is below. > > I believe that Luca has still seen problems with this patch applied so > its current status is "stuck, awaiting developments". > > Is that a correct determination? > I would propose that you forward a patch to Linus - either the one you have in your tree or the v2 that I've just posted. With stock 2.6.35-rc3, my semtimedop() stress tests produces an oops or an invalid return value (i.e.:semtimedop() returns with "1") within a fraction of a second. With either of the patches applied, my test apps show the expected behavior. -- Manfred -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Andrew Morton on 30 Jun 2010 16:00 On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 21:38:43 +0200 Manfred Spraul <manfred(a)colorfullife.com> wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > On 06/29/2010 09:08 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 10:42:42 -0500 (CDT) > > Christoph Lameter<cl(a)linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > > > > >> This is a patch from Manfred. Required to make 2.6.35-rc3 work. > >> > >> > > My current version of the patch is below. > > > > I believe that Luca has still seen problems with this patch applied so > > its current status is "stuck, awaiting developments". > > > > Is that a correct determination? > > > > I would propose that you forward a patch to Linus - either the one you > have in your tree or the v2 that I've just posted. OK, I added the incremental change: --- a/ipc/sem.c~ipc-semc-bugfix-for-semop-not-reporting-successful-operation-update +++ a/ipc/sem.c @@ -1440,7 +1440,14 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(semtimedop, int, semid, if (error != -EINTR) { /* fast path: update_queue already obtained all requested - * resources */ + * resources. + * Perform a smp_mb(): User space could assume that semop() + * is a memory barrier: Without the mb(), the cpu could + * speculatively read in user space stale data that was + * overwritten by the previous owner of the semaphore. + */ + smp_mb(); + goto out_free; } _ > With stock 2.6.35-rc3, my semtimedop() stress tests produces an oops or > an invalid return value (i.e.:semtimedop() returns with "1") within a > fraction of a second. > > With either of the patches applied, my test apps show the expected behavior. OK, I'll queue it up. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|
Pages: 1 Prev: [PATCH -rt 2/2] Make sure d_kill sets d_parent to null Next: Removing dead MSM7X00A_IDLE |