From: Oleg Nesterov on 9 Mar 2010 17:50 __call_usermodehelper(UMH_NO_WAIT) has 2 problems: - if kernel_thread() fails, call_usermodehelper_freeinfo() is not called. - for unknown reason UMH_NO_WAIT has UMH_WAIT_PROC logic, we spawn yet another thread which waits until the user mode application exits. Change the UMH_NO_WAIT code to use ____call_usermodehelper() instead of wait_for_helper(), and do call_usermodehelper_freeinfo() unconditionally. We can rely on CLONE_VFORK, do_fork(CLONE_VFORK) until the child exits or execs. With or without this patch UMH_NO_WAIT does not report the error if kernel_thread() fails, this is correct since the caller doesn't wait for result. Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg(a)redhat.com> --- kernel/kmod.c | 10 ++++------ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) --- mm/kernel/kmod.c~2_UMH_NO_WAIT 2010-03-09 21:31:09.000000000 +0100 +++ mm/kernel/kmod.c 2010-03-09 21:56:36.000000000 +0100 @@ -224,10 +224,7 @@ static int wait_for_helper(void *data) sub_info->retval = ret; } - if (sub_info->wait == UMH_NO_WAIT) - call_usermodehelper_freeinfo(sub_info); - else - complete(sub_info->complete); + complete(sub_info->complete); return 0; } @@ -236,13 +233,13 @@ static void __call_usermodehelper(struct { struct subprocess_info *sub_info = container_of(work, struct subprocess_info, work); - pid_t pid; enum umh_wait wait = sub_info->wait; + pid_t pid; /* CLONE_VFORK: wait until the usermode helper has execve'd * successfully We need the data structures to stay around * until that is done. */ - if (wait == UMH_WAIT_PROC || wait == UMH_NO_WAIT) + if (wait == UMH_WAIT_PROC) pid = kernel_thread(wait_for_helper, sub_info, CLONE_FS | CLONE_FILES | SIGCHLD); else @@ -251,6 +248,7 @@ static void __call_usermodehelper(struct switch (wait) { case UMH_NO_WAIT: + call_usermodehelper_freeinfo(sub_info); break; case UMH_WAIT_PROC: -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|
Pages: 1 Prev: swiotlb: minor fixes for 2.6.35 Next: Possible bug in eeepc-laptop.c - EeePC 900 |